Portfolio
SEMESTER 3 2021/22 REFER DEFER PERIOD
MODULE CODE:
6SUEV004W
MODULE TITLE:
Sustainable Supply Chain Management for Finance and
Accounting
DATE AVAILABLE:
SUBMISSION DATE:
Friday 24th June 2022
Thursday 14th July 2022 by 13.00 hours UK Time
Feedback will be in Week commencing 1st August 2022 through Blackboard.
This assessment is worth 75% of the marks for this module
Submit coursework by the due time and date as instructed on the module
blackboard site. You are strongly advised not to leave your hand-in until the
deadline as this can result in lateness penalties due to many unforeseen
circumstances including queues, PC problems, file problems etc.
Learning Outcomes addressed
LO3 Analyse new, novel or abstract data using an appropriate range of subject-specific
techniques. Judges the reliability, validity and significance of evidence to support
conclusions/recommendations
LO4 Operate in complex, unpredictable environments, requiring selection and application
from a range of often standard techniques and information sources
LO5 Work with ideas at a level of abstraction, arguing from competing perspectives.
Identifies the possibility of new concepts within existing knowledge frameworks
and approaches
ASSESSMENT SPECIFICATION
1
The Portfolio is final assessment on the module and requires you to build on your work in
Seminars. You need to:
1. Submit a 2000 word report (excluding references, tables and diagrams) evaluating
a selected aspect of either Social or Environmental performance in the Supply
Chain of your chosen commodity.
2. Submit your work on exploring the social media data set on a Sustainable Supply
Chains in the topic of your choice, showing the work you have done in creating data
visualisations and a dashboard and analysing your results. (750 – 1000 words
excluding diagrams).
Weightings for each item are shown below.
Guidance
In addition to the guidance below, and that delivered in Seminars, Blackboard will have a
summary guidance Panopto video for the portfolio assessment.
Report on Commodity Supply Chain Sustainability Performance (2000 words, 60%)
This report addresses evaluation of performance in ONE area of sustainability in the
Supply Chain of a commodity of your choice. A list of potential Commodities to explore is
given below. The report should represent an evaluation of performance through critical
evaluation of secondary data sources. A suggested structure and word count allocation is
given below:
1. Introduction clearly setting out the report contents and the aspect of Sustainability
performance you are evaluating in your commodity supply chain. (250 words)
2. Methodology for searches of the academic literature and other sources (250 words)
3. Commodity overview (150 words)
4. Sustainability and Supply Chain Performance Data for the chosen area of
evaluation (100 words as data presentation should be in tables not included in word
count)
5. Critical evaluation of Supply Chain performance on your chosen sustainability focus
(800 words)
6. Recommendations for improvement (250 words)
7. Conclusions (200 words)
8. References (single reference list at the end of document and NOT included in the
word count)
Commodities List
2
Choose one of these OR consult Module Staff on any alternative you wish to pursue
Commodity
Category
Metals
Aluminium
Food- Fruit and
Vegetables
Avocado
Oils
Coconut Oil
Beverages
Coffee
Cosmetics
Textiles
Iron/Steel
Bananas
Olive Oil
Tea
Talc
Cotton
Construction
Menthol
Linen/Flax
Granite
Marble
Analysis of Social Media Data Set (750 – 1000 words, 40%)
Through the digital skills development in Lectures and Seminars on the module, you will
have chosen a substantial and unique data set from social media related to your chosen
Sustainability topic and you will have established a collection of data visualisations of your
data set using either EXCEL,Tableau Software OR a mixture of both. You are required
to produce a critical analysis of your results. In order to do this, you must follow the tasks
below.
1. Introduction – a brief overview of the contents of your analysis. (100 words)
2. Presentation of Results and critical analysis (500 – 750 words). Presentation of
data in either Tableau OR Excel through Charts as covered in videos posted
to the Refer Defer area
3. Conclusions (100 – 150 words).
4. References (single reference list at the end of document).
A note on Word Count
The overall word count is 3000 words. Guidance on using this is given above but students
may deviate from this if they wish so for example, students can split the two pieces of work
in the Portfolio 1300 words: 700 words. It is recommended however, that you do not
deviate too much as this will impact on marks awarded for evaluation or analysis – you
need to ensure you have enough word count to do this well in both pieces of work in the
portfolio.
STRUCTURE AND STYLE OF SUBMISSION
YOU NEED TO SUBMIT ONE WORD DOCUMENT OR PDF AS FOLLOWS
3
Style
Single-spaced, 12-point text, standard margins.
References should be in a single list in Alphabetical order. Do not keep web references
separate, do not forget the access dates for the latter.
Structure
Report Structure/Layout:
Title page – should state your report Title which should clearly state your chosen
Company for analysis
No Student ID (Anonymous Marking)
Word Count total and breakdown for Report and Analysis of Social Media Data Set
Contents Page
• Report
• Analysis of Social Media Data Set
Assessment Criteria
The marking rubric to be used to assess the portfolio will be placed on the module
Blackboard site in the Assessment Area and is also attached at the end of this document.
Electronic Submission of Coursework
Unless explicitly stated otherwise in writing by the module leader, all coursework on this
module is submitted via Blackboard only. It will automatically be scanned through a text
matching system (designed to check for possible plagiarism).
To submit your assignment:
• Log on to Blackboard at http://learning.westminster.ac.uk;
• Go to the relevant module Blackboard site;
• Click on the ‘Submit Coursework’ link in the navigation menu on the left-hand side,
or as advised by the module teaching team;
• Click on the link for the relevant assignment;
• Follow the instructions.
• You have been given details by the module teaching team about how and when you
will receive your marks and feedback on your work (see the module handbook)
REMEMBER:
It is a requirement that you submit your work in this way. All coursework must be submitted
by 13.00 (1pm) on the due date. If you submit your coursework late but within 24 hours or
one working day of the specified deadline, 10% of the overall marks available for that
element of assessment will be deducted, as a penalty for late submission, except for work
which is marked in the range 40 – 49%, in which case the mark will be capped at the pass
mark (40%). If you submit your coursework more than 24 hours or more than one working
day after the specified deadline you will be given a mark of zero for the work in question.
The University’s mitigating circumstances procedures relating to the non-submission or
late submission of coursework apply to all coursework.
The MARKING RUBRIC IS ON PAGE 5
4
5
6SUEV004W Portfolio Marking Rubric Refer Defer Students 21/22 Academic year
•
Description
Rubric for the portfolio for Semester Three Refer/defer June 2022
Rubric Detail
Levels of Achievement
Criteria
Needs to improve
< 30
Borderline 30-39
Acceptable 40 – 49 Good 50 -59
Very Good 60-69
Excellent 70-79
Outstanding 80+
Introduction and
Introduction and
Methodology
Introduction and
Introduction and
Methodology is
attempts to follow
Methodology
Methodology
Introduction and
basic and not
some of the
follows all guidance
Introduction and
follows most of the
Methodology
following guidance. guidance given but
but could be clearer
Methodology are
guidance given but
follows all guidance
To improve in
improvements
in places. To
thoroughly
not all. To improve,
and is clear. To
future, ensure you needed. To
improve, review
explained. In future,
ensure you
further improve, ask
understand the task improve, ensure you
your work and
ensure you maintain
understand guidance
yourself what may
and follow
follow all
ensure you do a
this standard.
given and follow
be added for insight.
instructions and
instructions and
final edit to improve
this more exactly.
guidance carefully. guidance for tasks
clarity.
carefully.
Very poor. To
Poor. To improve, Acceptable but
improve, ensure
ensure basics of
some elements of
basics of page
page numbering,
presentation (title
numbering, title
title page with all
page, page
Overall
page with all
information,
numbering, layout Good standard. To
Excellent, maintain
Presentati
Very good standard.
information,
contents page and for example) could improve, review all
this standard, to
on and
To improve, ensure
contents page and consistent font size improve.
presentation
improve, aim for a
citation
you carefully check
Professional,
consistent font size as per instructions Referencing style guidance and check
professional looking
and
all references and
maintain this
as per instructions are followed. You also needs to
the referencing
document, for
Referenci
have followed all
standard.
are followed. You need to improve the improve. Please
guide to ensure all
example through
ng
presentation
need to improve the referencing style.
check the booklet references are in the
use of table of
Weight
guidance.
referencing style.
Please check the
‘Using Westminster correct format.
contents.
10.00%
Please check the
booklet ‘Using
Harvard guide
booklet ‘Using
Westminster
(PDF)’
Westminster
Harvard guide
https://www.westmi
Harvard guide
(PDF)’
nster.ac.uk/library-
Introduction and
Methodology
Introducti
section absent or
on and
very minimal. To
Report
improve in future,
Methodolo
ensure you
gy
understand the task
Weight
and follow
10.00%
instructions and
guidance carefully.
6
Levels of Achievement
Criteria
Needs to improve
Borderline 30-39 Acceptable 40 – 49 Good 50 -59
< 30
(PDF)’
https://www.westmi and-it/support-andhttps://www.westmi nster.ac.uk/library- study-skills/guidesnster.ac.uk/library- and-it/support-and- andand-it/support-and- study-skills/guides- tutorials/referencing
study-skills/guides- and-your-work
andtutorials/referencing
tutorials/referencing -your-work
-your-work
Performance data
Minimal effort,
Performance data
clear and evaluation
structure and flow and evaluation are
Clear presentation
is attempted in
need to improve,
not very clear,
of data and an
Report
places but much is
may lack a
report lacks
attempt at
Findings
descriptive. All
conclusion. To
analysis, the writing
evaluation, good in
Analysis
elements present.
improve, you need is descriptive only.
places but not
and
To improve, you
to develop your
To improve, you
consistent. All
Conclusio
need to move away
writing, particularly need to develop
elements present.
n
from description to
evaluative writing. . your writing for
To improve, you
evaluative writing,
There are many
university. There
need to develop
Weight
there are many
resources to help
are many resources
consistency in your
40.00%
resources to help
develop writing
to help develop
writing and
develop this both on
both on line and in writing both on line
eliminate areas of
line and in the
the library.
and in the library.
poorer style.
library.
Absent or the wrong
material. Videos to
support students
Social
should have been
Media
used. Assessments At least two of the
Analysis
are designed on the required
Visualisati
basis of this. Lack visualisations
ons
of engagement may present.
Weight
be the key issue for
10.00%
you here, ensure
you improve in
future
At least three of the
required
visualisations
At least four of the
present and some
required
attempt at correct
visualisations
labelling. To
present and
improve, ensure you labelling mostly
attend all timetabled good. To improve,
sessions of a
you needed to
module, these are follow instructions
designed to help
on visualisations
you manage the
required.
work.
Very Good 60-69
Excellent 70-79
Outstanding 80+
Very well presented
Excellent
performance data
presentation of data,
with good analysis
very good
of these,
evaluation and
recommendations
Professional
recommendations
and conclusion
presentation of data,
and overall
present and clear
excellent and
evaluation of the
evaluation overall
insightful
company
of performance. To
evaluation.
performance is
further improve,
Maintain this
meaningful. To
review your work to
standard.
improve, ensure
add more insightful
high standard in all
analysis and ensure
sections of the
your work is
report
comprehensive.
All five required
All five required
visualisations
visualisation present
All required
present, very clearly
and well labelled
visualisations
presented and
and presented
present,
legible with clear
clearly. To improve,
professionally
and correct
ensure presentation
presented and
labelling. To
of visualisations
legible with clear
improve further,
contains all required
and correct labelling
additional work
elements.
may be needed.
7
Levels of Achievement
Criteria
Social
Media
Analysis
Report
Weight
30.00%
Needs to improve
< 30
Absent or minimal,
to improve, see
comments on the
Visualisations.
Borderline 30-39
Acceptable 40 – 49 Good 50 -59
Most of the
guidance has NOT
been followed. To
improve, see
comments on the
Visualisations.
Guidance has been
Follows all
Much of the
followed, all
guidance and very Follows all
guidance followed, components present,
Follows all
good analysis of
guidance and
some components analysis is too
guidance and
findings in many
consistently
missing, analysis is descriptive in many
consistently
areas but could be excellent analysis of
very descriptive. To areas. To improve,
excellent, insightful
more consistent. To findings. To
improve, ensure
aim to write
and interesting
improve, develop
improve, review
your analysis shows consistently well –
analysis of findings,
consistency through your work and see if
evaluation of
review where your
maintain this
allowing yourself you can add real
results, not just
writing is good and
standard.
more time for
insight.
description of them. where it is not and
editing.
aim to edit further.
Very Good 60-69
Excellent 70-79
Outstanding 80+
8
Purchase answer to see full
attachment