ARH 2000 University of South FL Saint John the Baptist from Getty Museum Report

  

This is part two of the original assignment

In the attachment file you will find:

1-Instructions for part 2.

2-my part 1 assignment with instructor’s feedback.

3-Instruction for part 1 assignment ( in case you need it )

I want you to fix my part 1 assignment based on feedback and instruction for part 2.

Make sure to add what you asked for in part 2.

Link to the book:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/10DgFDoimZsMmX70vGSyGrckC4zVAE67W/view

In the instruction for part 2 you will be asked to read page 176, but in the book I provided for you use page 184.

STUDENT1
Student
Introduction
The museum attended in the preparation of the report is Getty Museum. The basic
organizations of the collections of the museum is based on the type of artworks. All the artworks
are placed in their appropriate groups based on the type, and these include paintings, drawings,
sculptures, and photography, among others. Generally, I was impressed by the experience, and I
viewed several presentations before settling on the artwork to analyze. This report offers an
analysis of an artwork in the Getty Museum titled Saint John the Baptist.
Formal Analysis
Identification of the Work and Brief Description of Its Subject Matter
The artwork selected is titled Saint John the Baptist, and it was created by Juan
Conchillos Falco. The artwork was made in November 1965, and the medium used in making it
include charcoal that has been heightened with opaque watercolor on laid paper prepared using
the opaque blue ground. The measurements or dimensions of the artwork are 43 cm by 26.9 cm.
Additionally, the subject matter depicted in the artwork is human culture during the time of John
the Baptist and religion since the person illustrated is linked to religion and especially
Christianity.
Analysis of Work In-Terms of Formal Elements of Art.
The artwork titled Saint John the Baptist will be analyzed based on three formal elements
of art. The first element of art to be used is the line, and this refers to a mark or an implied mark
that is found between two endpoints. Lines are the most significant elements that are used by
STUDENT2
artists in presenting their work, and without them, it would be almost impossible for artists to
know where to begin (DeWitte et al. 48). In Saint John the Baptist artwork, a line is evident
where gritty black lines build up in bold succession are used to portray Saint John’s musculature
dramatically. A line is also portrayed where it is used to show the support John the Baptist is
holding on.
Another formal element of art that will be used in analyzing the artwork is texture.
Texture usually refers to the surface quality if a particular work. For instance, the texture of the
artwork can either be detailed or lacking details. It can also be either fine or course. In the case of
Saint John the Baptist, the texture is rough. The charcoal used in creating the drawing gives it a
rough texture. Texture has an impact on the way we view artwork, and people majorly rely on
their sense of touch to get information concerning the texture (DeWitte et al. 77).
The third formal element of art that will be used in analyzing Saint John the Baptist is
shape. Shape usually refers to a two-dimensional area whose boundaries are defined using lines
or implied by using value or color 60. There are several aspects that can be used to bring out the
shape of an object, and they include the use of colors or lines to show the boundaries. In the case
of St John the Baptist, shape is evident where the artist, Juan, makes the drawing a rectangle. St
John is standing, and Juan decided to color his surroundings so that everything could appear part
of the artwork, as seen in the drawing in Appendix 1. The artist was not only interested in the
drawing of John but also its surrounding. Another aspect of shape is in Saint John’s head, which
appears to take an oval shape.
Analysis of Work’s Composition In Terms of Principles of Design
STUDENT3
Principles of design are used to explain the manner in which the elements of art are
constructed in a particular piece. In analyzing Saint John the Baptist, the principles of design to
be used include scale. According to DeWitte et al., the scale used in creating a work of art
usually communicates a lot concerning it (146). A relatively small work of art communicates
something different as compared to a large work of art. In the case of Saint John the Baptist, the
dimensions are 43 cm by 26.9 cm. This is a relatively small scale, and the viewer will be forced
to move closer to the drawing for them to have a clear look at it and have its experience
(DeWitte et al. 144). This drawing implies intimacy and can be associated with whispering
something in another person’s years.
The second principle of design that will be applied in analyzing Saint John the Baptist is
proportion. This refers to the relationship that exists between the sizes of different parts of the
artwork. Proportion gives an artist an opportunity to improve both the descriptive and expressive
characteristics of their work. For instance, in the case Saint John the Baptist, it is evident that the
artist had knowledge about proportional ratios, and this is evident where the two legs of Saint
John are proportional. Further, taking a closer look at his hands, they are also proportional.
Generally, the entire body of Saint John appears proportional, and no part of the body can be said
to be smaller in relation to the other parts.
The third element of design that will be applied in analyzing the artwork is emphasis.
Emphasis refers to the technique or principle of directing the viewer’s attention to a specific part
or content in a work of art (DeWitte et al. 156). In the case of Saint John the Baptist, Juan was
interested in emphasizing the entire work in its wholeness. He does not seem to be emphasizing
on any specific area.
STUDENT4
Discussion of Medium
The object is two-dimensional, and the medium is charcoal that has been heightened with
opaque white watercolor on laid paper prepared using an opaque blue ground. The major
limitation that might arise from using this medium is having a drawing that is not colorful or
does not combine many colors
The object is a drawing, and the materials utilized in drawing it include paper,
watercolor, and charcoal. Juan was able to make controlled strokes using this particular medium,
and this tool would create a thick line. It is worth noting that this drawing was intended to be an
artwork by itself, and it greatly shows Jun’s high level of creativity.
Interpretation
The different formal aspects of the work, such as line, shape, and texture, work in unison to
come up with a significant meaning. Further, other elements such as proportion, emphasis as
well as scale also work in unison to come up with a proportional, well balanced, and clear work
of art. Juan’s choice of medium and materials affected the message and reception in that it
allowed him to bring out his ideas and make a reflection on a known person in religion. The
questions the work leaves me with include why Juan chose to dress John the Baptist way he did.
It is important to note that the main aim of Juan was to bring out the culture or way of life during
the period of John the Baptist. The visual analysis changed my first reaction as well as the
interpretation of the work. This is in that, at first, I was not aware of the medium used in creating
the work and other aspects of the work. However, after the visual analysis, I now understand the
work better.
Conclusion
STUDENT5
In conclusion, this museum report has analyzed John the Baptist by Juan. The three formal
elements of art that were applied in analyzing the artwork include line, texture, and shape.
Additionally, the three principles of design applied in analyzing the artwork are emphasis, scale as
well as proportion. The medium used in creating the artwork is charcoal, and the artwork is a
drawing. Besides, the artwork was indented to be a drawing.
STUDENT6
Works Cited
DeWitte, Debra, Ralph M. Larmann, and M. Kathryn Shields. Gateways to Art. Thames &
Hudson, 2015.
STUDENT7
Appendix 1: Proof of Attendance (POA).
Saint John the Baptist by Juan Falco
ARH2000 Art & Culture
Museum Report, Part ONE
15 points / 15% of final grade
Submit your essay via the link provided in CANVAS
Your work will be checked via TurnItIn, the University’s plagiarism detection service.
The Museum Report is a process paper, to be completed in two (2) stages. These are instructions for
Part One. Feedback will be provided before you complete Part Two. You will be expected to utilize
that feedback before making revisions for Part Two, due later in the course.
For this assignment, you will visit a virtual art museum and engage in a formal analysis of a selected
artwork, considering the work as primary source. By formal analysis, I am asking you to consider the
artwork’s visual attributes as they relate to the formal elements and principles of design (listed on page
41). In addition to the visual elements, you will discuss the artist’s choice of medium.
HOW TO PREPARE FOR THIS ASSIGNMENT
You will use and apply concepts learned in Module 2 in Canvas and Part 1 of the textbook (starting on page
41). Before completing this essay, review pages 38-39 and pages 170-172 of the textbook.
FORMAT AND SUBMISSION GUIDELINES:
 Part One of the Museum Report should be at least 4 full pages in length, no less than 1200 words.
Include a word count at the bottom of your essay.
 Although I am calling this essay a “part” or a “stage” of a writing process, do NOT submit a draft. You are
expected to submit a fully complete essay for both Part One and Part Two, with clearly developed
introduction and conclusion paragraphs for each stage.
 Use MLA guidelines when composing your paper. Use 12-point font, Times New Roman, one inch
margins and indent the first line of each new paragraph. Double-space your paper. Italicize all artwork
titles. Writing in first person is acceptable.
 This assignment is submitted to Turnitin, an automated plagiarism detection service. Do NOT include
your name or student ID within the paper. Replace your name with “Student.” Do not include a title
page.
 Submit in a Word document (.doc, .docx) or convert to PDF. Any other formats are NOT accepted and
will result in a zero (0) grade. Corrupt files or incorrect documents will also result in a zero (0).
 Proofread your paper before submission. You must use correct grammar, punctuation, and spelling.
Utilize the resources provided by the Writing Studio at USF. They offer online resources in addition to
in-person appointments. Another good online resource is the Purdue Online Writing Lab.
 Include a screenshot of the artwork within your “virtual museum” as proof of attendance (POA)
at the end of your paper. Failure to attach POA will result in a reduced grade.
 LATE POLICY: The syllabus policy on late work applies. Remember, technical issues, problems with
your computer, slow upload times, submission of incorrect files or file types, etc. will NOT exempt you
from the late policy. Please take a moment and double check your submission.
 WHICH VIRTUAL MUSEUM TO VISIT? Please see the list within our canvas course for virtual museum
options.
Page 1 of 4
ARH2000 Art & Culture
INSTRUCTIONS
A work of art is the product of the dynamic interrelationships between the various art elements and
principles. As you analyze the artwork, ask yourself why the artist made such choices. By considering the
formal elements and principles of design involved, you can make yourself look more closely at the work
of art, and thus understand more fully the artist’s intended vision, as well as noticing how the work reflects
the time and place from whence it came.
You must address ALL the prompts below within your essay, but your response need not be organized in
the exact order given. Your paper must include proper introductory and concluding paragraphs.
I. Formal Analysis (this section should be the “meat” of your paper): Find any work of art in the
museum that interests you. You will engage in a thorough visual analysis of that work. There should be no
need to consult outside sources for the content of your paper. Reflect directly on the work using the
material you have learned from the course. Follow the guidelines below.
•
Identify the work fully (artist name if known, title if available, time period or date, medium,
dimensions or approximate dimensions).
•
Provide a brief description of the subject matter of the work.
•
Analyze, describe, and discuss the work in terms of three (3) formal elements of art.
•
Analyze, describe, and discuss the works’ composition using three (3) principles of design.
•
o
**IMPORTANT: It is expected that the analysis of the work’s formal elements and
principles of design be the most in-depth and therefore most time should be spent on
this section. You must demonstrate your understanding of the concepts learned in the
course by utilizing appropriate course vocabulary within your analysis. Please use precise
terminology associated with the elements and principles chosen. Failure to do so will result
in a reduced grade. Consult the chapters and course material from Module 2.
o
Spend a good amount of time looking at the work and taking notes. It is helpful to provide
the reader with an overall picture of the work you are describing. You may find it useful to
pretend you are describing the work to someone who cannot see, but must create an
impression of the work based solely on your words. Clearly and articulately analyze and
describe the formal elements and principles of design that you see in the work. There may
be many, but be selective and try to determine the most significant elements of composition.
Remember to utilize key terms from the textbook associated with the specific
elements/principles chosen.
Is the work non-objective, representational, figurative, or abstract? Note that a work of art can fall
into more than one of these categories. Please explain fully and in a way that demonstrates you
have a correct understanding of the term(s) as it relates to our course content.
II. Discussion of Medium: Examine your artwork further by discussing the medium used and the artist’s
technique and application of materials. Is the object two- or three-dimensional? What limitations, if any,
might the chosen medium create for the artist? Below are some further questions to consider, depending
on the type of medium employed. See Part Two of your textbook (Media & Processes) for further information
on art materials and media.
•
Painting: How did the type of paint affect the strokes the artist could make? Was it fresco, oil, tempera, or
watercolor? Was it a fast-drying paint that allowed little time to make changes? What kind of textures and lines
Page 2 of 4
ARH2000 Art & Culture
was the artist able to create with this medium? Does it lend a shiny or flat look? How durable was the medium?
Does the work look the same today as when the artist painted it?
•
Drawing: Consider the materials utilized: metal point, chalk, charcoal, graphite, crayon, pastel, ink, and wash. Is
the artist able to make controlled strokes with this medium? Would the tool create a thick or thin, defined or
blurred line? Was the drawing intended to be a work of art in itself, or is it a study for another work, a peek into
the artist’s creative process?
•
Printmaking: What is the process the artist undertook to create this work? Did he or she need to carve or etch?
Did the medium require a steady hand? Strength or patience?
•
Photography: What is the process the artist undertook to create this work? Is it an example of early
photography or more recent processes? Is it created from digital, film or other processes? Documentary? Staged?
•
Sculpture: Is the sculpture high or low relief, or can we see it in the round? What challenges did the material
present to the artist? Was the work created through a subtractive process or an additive one? What tools did the
artist use to create the form? Is your work created from constructing or assembling things together?
•
Craft: Is it made of fiber, textile, ceramics, metalwork, glass, etc? Is the art object considered craft or fine art?
Why? Can works of fine art be utilitarian, in your opinion?
•
Alternative media and processes: Is your work a video, sound art, interactive, a work of conceptual art or even a
performance piece? How does it differ from traditional works of art? Did you encounter the actual work itself, or
is it documentation of an event or a time-based piece? Do you find it easier or more difficult to apply a formal
analysis to this type of work? Explain.
III. Interpretation: This is the part of the paper where you go beyond description and offer a conclusion
and your own informed opinion about the work.
•
Consider how the formal aspects of the work and the subject matter work together to produce
significant meaning.
•
How did the artist’s choice of materials and medium affect its message and reception?
•
What questions does the work raise or leave you with, if any? Is it possible to make a reasoned
statement about the artist’s aim?
•
Describe your personal reaction to the work. Did a visual analysis change your first reaction and
interpretation of the work?
In addition to the above, include the following somewhere within your essay:
•
Which museum did you attend?
•
What is the basic organization of the museum’s collections? Discuss your personal overall
impression of the experience itself, the museum, the exhibitions and their presentation.
•
Do not forget to include your “Proof of Attendance” (screenshot of the work within the virtual
museum).
Page 3 of 4
ARH2000 Art & Culture
Rubric
The rubric below is a general guide. A rubric with points and specific grading criteria is attached to the
assignment in Canvas and will be used in evaluation.
Museum Report, Part One – General Grading Rubric
POINTS
out of 15
SUPERIOR WORK
GOOD
AVERAGE – BELOW AVERAGE
POOR
A
B
C
D, F
POA
no POA: -1.5 points
ONE DAY LATE?
-3 points
Identification,
Description,
Interpretation
& Analysis
Followed all directions.
Provided an exceptionally
detailed, insightful and
accurate analysis
throughout. Multiple
instances of precise use of
key terms. Exceptionally
critical, relevant and
consistent commentary on
connections made between
use of elements/principles,
subject matter and
meaning.
Followed all directions.
Proficient description of work
with ample observations but
more elaboration and insight is
needed. Needs further use of
key terms to show full
understanding of course
concepts. Consistent
connections made between
use of elements/principles,
subject matter and meaning.
Followed most but not all
directions.
Descriptions somewhat
clear but discussion lacks
sufficient detail.
Omits important
elements/principles/detail but
does include several accurate
observations.
Demonstrates adequate
understanding of
elements/principles but
lacks sufficient detail.
Did not follow direction.
Lacks many important details.
Limited or inaccurate use of
terms. Little or no discussion
of how the artist expressed
his/her idea/concept or no
analysis of how the
artist used technique &
elements/principles.
Lack of in-depth analysis.
Organization
Exceptionally clear, logical,
eloquent, thorough
development of ideas.
Excellent transition between
paragraphs. Plenty of
evidence provided for
support. Provides
identifiable and effective
introductory and concluding
paragraphs.
Clear and logical flow of ideas.
Good transitions between
paragraphs with only a couple
of rough patches. Good points,
observations, insights made
but not entirely fleshed out.
Introduction/conclusion
identifiable but a little
awkward.
Somewhat clear and logical
development but many
observations need
elaboration/development.
Attempts to use transitions
between ideas and paragraphs
but still reads like a rough
draft. Needs more supporting
detail/elaboration to flesh out
key points.
Introduction/conclusion very
unclear.
Paper lacks clear and logical
development of ideas,
organizational structure
confusing. Weak or no
transition between ideas and
paragraphs. Did not provide
an introduction and/or
conclusion.
Language
Conventions
Concise, clear, with
flawless or near-flawless
grammar, spelling and
paragraphing.
Eloquent style.
Clear with mostly proper
grammar, spelling and
paragraphing. A few awkward
phrases but not enough to
confuse meaning.
Some errors in grammar,
spelling. Paragraphs not
unified. Level of language
approaches a college level,
but imprecise word choice.
Inconsistent or bad
grammar, incorrect spelling,
haphazard or no
paragraphing. Level of
language below college level.
Page 4 of 4
ARH2000 Art & Culture
Museum Report, PART TWO (Final Submission)
6 points / 6% of final grade
Submit your essay via the link provided in CANVAS
Your work will be checked via TurnItIn, the University’s plagiarism detection service.
IMPORTANT: The Museum Report is a process paper, to be completed in two (2) stages. The
instructions that follow are for Part Two. You must wait for feedback from your instructor/grader
on Part One before final submission.
In this second and final stage of your Museum Report paper, you will both revise and expand upon your
Part One essay using feedback provided by the instructor/grader. In addition to making revisions based on
feedback, you will also add an examination of the work using one of the following types of analysis
listed on page 176 of your textbook: stylistic, iconographic, contextual, feminist, gender studies,
critical race or psychological analysis. Use the instructions on the following pages.
FORMAT AND SUBMISSION GUIDELINES: Use this checklist to ensure your essay is organized correctly.
 Part Two of the Museum Report paper should be at least 4-5 full pages in length, no less than 1600
words. This is not 1600 new words – the word count includes any previously written material from
Part One. Include a word count at the bottom of your essay.
 Your essay should include fully developed introduction and conclusion paragraphs. Revise these as
necessary to conform to your underlying thesis and findings in Part Two.
 Use MLA guidelines when composing your paper. Use 12-point font, Times New Roman, one inch
margins and indent the first line of each new paragraph. Double-space your paper. Italicize all artwork
titles. Writing in first person is acceptable.
 Since this paper will be submitted via TurnitIn, do not include your name or student ID within the
paper or as a header. Replace your name with “Student.” Do not include a title page.
 Submit in a Word document (.doc, .docx) or convert to .pdf. Any other formats are NOT accepted and
will result in a zero (0) grade. Corrupt files or incorrect documents will also result in a zero (0).
 Proofread your paper before submission. You must use correct grammar, punctuation, and spelling.
 Utilize the resources provided by the Writing Studio at USF. They offer online resources in addition to
in-person appointments. Another good online resource is the Purdue Online Writing Lab.
 Proof of Attendance (POA) should remain attached to your paper.
Instructions continue below.
Page 1 of 3
ARH2000 Art & Culture
INSTRUCTIONS
I. Revise/Edit your previously completed formal analysis (where necessary): Review any feedback
from the instructor/grader in regards to your visual analysis in Part One (see page 3 of these instructions for
a “how-to”). Revise or edit as requested. Consider the following:
 General Writing, Grammar, and Mechanics: For further help, see resources on page one.
 Content: If you needed to elaborate or correct issues related to content, remember to review
course material in Module 2, including the chapters in Part 2 of the textbook.
 Introduction, Thesis, and Conclusion: Because you will be adding new content to this paper,
your introduction, thesis, and conclusion will be revised to appropriately include the new
developments in your analysis. Be clear about your thesis. Your thesis may concern one
aspect of the artwork or consider it as a whole, in context. It may consider how the artwork
communicates a certain message or evokes a specific response.
II. Further Analysis: To further understand your artwork beyond strictly visual attributes, select an
alternative type of analysis from the list below. An overview of each is provided in chapter 1.10. Although
your examination of the work in this section will be briefer than your formal analysis, it will help
you understand the work more fully. When utilizing any secondary sources, remember to cite correctly.
•
Choose one (1) of the following and discuss your artwork. The questions below are meant to
prompt your thought process. Clearly identify which type of analysis you have chosen.
•
Stylistic analysis: What is it about the artwork makes it distinctive to the artist (e.g. technique, form,
subject matter)? Are characteristics of the work shared by a group of artists and/or is the work of art
part of a particular art movement? How so? Is it representative of a particular place or time period?
•
Iconographic analysis: Are there things in the work that you can interpret as signs or symbols? For
example, is there anything that suggests a religious meaning, or indicates the social status of somebody
depicted in the work? Labels often provide good information about iconography.
•
Contextual analysis: Would you understand the work better if you knew something about the history
of the era in which it was created, or about religious, political, economic, and social issues that
influenced its creation? The following are specific ways you may approach a contextual analysis:
o
Biographical: How might information about the life of the artist may help you to interpret the
work? Labels are often a good source of biographical detail. In some museums volunteer
docents are available to answer questions about an artist’s life and works.
o
Religious: How is the artwork related to the religious context in which it was made? Are there
narrative, symbolic elements, or important persons related to a religious/spiritual context?
o
Historical/social: Consider historical events, and the way they appear in the work.
•
Feminist analysis: Is the role of women in the artwork important? Is the artist commenting on the
experience of women in society? Is the artist a woman?
•
Other alternative types of analysis (Gender Studies, Critical Race, Psychological) are expanded
upon in the textbook.
IV. Interpretation: Now that you have examined your artwork from a variety of perspectives, reflect upon
your findings as a whole. Your discussion should demonstrate that you understand the visual elements,
content, and context of the artwork and how they work together to produce significant meaning. This is the
part of the paper where you go beyond description and offer your own informed opinion about the work.
Page 2 of 3
ARH2000 Art & Culture
In your concluding paragraph, reiterate important points that you made. Consider leaving the reader with
something further to contemplate – artworks sometimes leave more questions than answers.
HOW TO VIEW FEEDBACK FROM PART ONE
We used a combination of the CANVAS rubric and annotations on your actual papers. To ensure that you
are able to see all of your feedback, here are some helpful “how-to” guides from Canvas:
•
•
Viewing Rubric Results
Viewing Annotated Comments (feedback directly on paper)
RUBRIC
The rubric below is a general guide. A rubric with points and specific grading criteria is attached to the
assignment in Canvas and will be used in evaluation.
Museum Report, Part Two – Grading Rubric
PROOF OF
ATTENDANCE
ONE DAY LATE?
SUPERIOR WORK
GOOD
AVERAGE – BELOW AVERAGE
POOR
A
B
C
D, F
POA remains attached (It is not re-evaluated; no further points will be assigned)
One day late: minus 20%
Identification,
Description,
Interpretation
& Analysis
Followed all directions.
Provided an exceptionally
detailed, insightful and
accurate analysis
throughout. Multiple
instances of precise use of
key terms. Exceptionally
critical, relevant and
consistent commentary on
connections made between
use of elements/principles,
subject matter and
meaning.
Followed all directions.
Proficient description of
work with ample
observations but more
elaboration and insight is
needed. Needs further use
of key terms to show full
understanding of course
concepts. Consistent
connections made between
use of elements/principles,
subject matter and
meaning.
Followed most but not all
directions.
Descriptions somewhat clear but
discussion lacks sufficient detail.
Omits important
elements/principles/detail but
does include several accurate
observations.
Demonstrates adequate
understanding of
elements/principles but
lacks sufficient detail.
Did not follow direction.
Lacks many important
details. Limited or
inaccurate use of terms.
Little or no discussion of
how the artist expressed
his/her
idea/concept or no
analysis of how the
artist used technique &
elements/principles.
Lack of in-depth
analysis.
Organization
Exceptionally clear, logical,
eloquent, thorough
development of ideas.
Excellent transition between
paragraphs. Plenty of
evidence provided for
support. Provides
identifiable and effective
introductory and concluding
paragraphs.
Clear and logical flow of
ideas. Good transitions
between paragraphs with
only a couple of rough
patches. Good points,
observations, insights made
but not entirely fleshed out.
Introduction/conclusion
identifiable but a little
awkward.
Somewhat clear and logical
development but many
observations need
elaboration/development.
Attempts to use transitions
between ideas and paragraphs
but still reads like a rough draft.
Needs more supporting
detail/elaboration to flesh out
key points.
Introduction/conclusion very
unclear.
Paper lacks clear and
logical development of
ideas, organizational
structure confusing.
Weak or no transition
between ideas and
paragraphs. Did not
provide an introduction
and/or conclusion.
Language
Conventions
Concise, clear, with
flawless or near-flawless
grammar, spelling and
paragraphing.
Eloquent style.
Clear with mostly proper
grammar, spelling and
paragraphing. A
few awkward phrases but
not enough to confuse
meaning.
Some errors in grammar, spelling.
Paragraphs not unified. Level of
language approaches a college
level, but imprecise word choice.
Inconsistent or bad
grammar, incorrect
spelling, haphazard
or no paragraphing.
Level of language
below college level.
Page 3 of 3

Purchase answer to see full
attachment