+1(978)310-4246 credencewriters@gmail.com
  

Write an 8-10 page paper that identifies how you met the eight outcomes in this course. Use proper APA formatting, a cover page, reference page, introduction and conclusion. Use an abbreviated version of the eight outcomes as headings.

Analyze issues and scenarios related to gerontological nursing, demonstrating leadership and caring while providing culturally-competent, client-centered care to the older adult population.

Demonstrate intentional learning with reflection as it relates to caring for the older adult client.

Understand and apply the integration of evidence in supporting concepts and processes which relate to gerontological nursing concepts.

Demonstrate clinical reasoning and decision-making skills while assessing the older adult clients’ health care needs and interventions.

Demonstrate leadership in organizational, local, and global environments as it relates to client assessment and intervention with older adult clients.

Communicate effectively and therapeutically with older adult clients, documenting as is appropriate.

Propose culturally-competent nursing care which promotes standard safe practices along with error and hazard prevention and quality improvement practices as it relates to clients in the older adult population.

Participate as a collaborative team member in understanding and implementing client care and in promoting the health of clients in the older adult population.

Write an 8-10 page paper that identifies how you met the eight outcomes in this course. Use
proper APA 7th formatting, a cover page, reference page, introduction and conclusion. Use an
abbreviated version of the eight outcomes as headings.
•
Analyze issues and scenarios related to gerontological nursing, demonstrating
leadership and caring while providing culturally-competent, client-centered care to
the older adult population.
•
Demonstrate intentional learning with reflection as it relates to caring for the older
adult client.
•
Understand and apply the integration of evidence in supporting concepts and
processes which relate to gerontological nursing concepts.
•
Demonstrate clinical reasoning and decision-making skills while assessing the older
adult clients’ health care needs and interventions.
•
Demonstrate leadership in organizational, local, and global environments as it relates
to client assessment and intervention with older adult clients.
•
Communicate effectively and therapeutically with older adult clients, documenting as
is appropriate.
•
Propose culturally-competent nursing care which promotes standard safe practices
along with error and hazard prevention and quality improvement practices as it relates
to clients in the older adult population.
•
Participate as a collaborative team member in understanding and implementing client
care and in promoting the health of clients in the older adult population.
•
400 level Hallmark Rubric
400 level Hallmark Rubric
Criteria
Ratings
This criterion is linked
to a Learning
OutcomeIntentional
Learning, Reflection,
and Clinical Judgment
65 to >59.0 pts
Exemplary
Identifies/addresses a
relevant topic and a thesis
that provides direction for
the content that is
engaging and thought
provoking. The thesis
clearly and concisely
states the position,
premise, or hypothesis
and is consistently the
focal point throughout the
presentation/paper.
Demonstrates a
sophisticated
understanding and
careful, critical analysis
of the research topic and
thesis (argument).
Compares/contrasts
perspectives, considers
counter arguments or
opposing positions, and
Evaluates original and
thoughtful conclusions
with future implications.
59 to >54.0 pts
Accomplished
Identifies/addresses a
relevant topic and a thesis
that provides adequate
direction for the content
with some degree of
interest for the reader.
60% or more of the thesis
states the position,
premise, or hypothesis,
and is the focal point of
the presentation/paper.
Demonstrates an
understanding and some
critical analysis of the
research topic and thesis
(argument). Adequately
compares/contrasts
perspectives,
counterarguments, or
opposing positions but
broader connections
and/or implications are
explored (>60%).
54 to >49.0 pts
Developing
Identifies a research
topic but is too broad in
scope and/or the thesis is
unclear and needs to be
developed further. Focal
point is not consistently
maintained throughout
the presentation/paper.
Demonstrates a general
understanding (0 pt
Unsatisfact
Beginning
Fails to iden
relevant res
or is not cle
defined and
presentation
lacks focus
Demonstrat
understandi
inadequate
the research
thesis (49.0 pts
Exemplary
Produces compelling and
accurate evidence to
support in-depth analysis
to the central position
beyond the required (4)
research sources with at
least 2 sources from a
periodical database.
Research sources are
relevant, accurate, recent
(less than 5 years old)
and reliable and add to
the strength of the
content.
49 to >44.0 pts
Accomplished
Produces essential,
accurate evidence to
support the central
position with the
required (3) research
sources including 1
source from a periodical
database that are
relevant, accurate,
recent (less than 5 years
old) and reliable.
44 to >40.0 pts
Developing
Produces evidence to
support the central
position with less
than 2 acceptable
research sources.
Sources may not be
relevant, accurate,
and reliable, greater
than 5 years old and
may not be from
scholarly sources.
40 to >0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Beginning
Lacks sufficient
sources to suppo
central position a
included, are not
accurate, or relia
Contains numero
mistakes, omissi
oversimplificatio
This criterion is linked
to a Learning
OutcomeOrganization
and Presentation
45 to >40.0 pts
Exemplary
Ideas are arranged
logically, flows
smoothly, with a strong
progression of thought
from paragraph to
paragraph connecting to
the central position.
Includes all required
components uses
provided template. For a
slide presentation, the
design, font size, style,
speaker notes/narration
and spacing are optimal
for audience viewing.
For a slide presentation
that is a group project
collaboration among
team members is evident
and there are peer
reviews completed.
Slide presentation rules:
· 6×6 bullet points, ·
Font ≥ 20 · Notes
associated with each
slide. · Includes the
required number of
slides, excluding Title
and Reference slides in
the count. · The
presentation uses
appropriate images or
animation.
40 to >35.0 pts
Accomplished
deas are arranged
reasonably with a
progression of thought
from paragraph to
paragraph connecting to
the central position.
Includes all required
components uses
provided template. For a
slide presentation, the
design, font size, style,
speaker notes/narration
and spacing are optimal
for audience viewing.
For a slide presentation
that is a group project
collaboration among
team members is evident
and there are peer
reviews completed.
Slide presentation rules:
· 6×6 bullet points, ·
Font ≥ 20 · Notes
associated with each
slide. · Includes the
required number of
slides, excluding Title
and Reference slides in
the count. · The
presentation uses
appropriate images or
animation.
35 to >30.0 pts
Developing
For a paper, ideas may
not flow well and/or
connect to the central
position. May be
missing a required
component and/or
components in the
provided template. For a
slide presentation,
multiple aspects (the
design, font size, style,
speaker notes/narration
and spacing) require
further development for
optimal audience
viewing. For a slide
presentation that is a
group project
collaboration among
team members is not
evident and there are no
peer reviews completed.
Slide presentation rules:
· 6×6 bullet points, ·
Font ≥ 20 · Notes
associated with each
slide. · Includes the
required number of
slides, excluding Title
and Reference slides in
the count. · The
presentation uses
appropriate images or
animation.
30 to >0 pts
Unsatisfactor
Beginning
Content lacks
organization a
impedes reade
comprehensio
For a paper, c
position is no
the paper is m
multiple requi
components o
template. For
presentation,
lacks (the des
size, style, spe
notes/narratio
spacing) for o
viewing by an
For a slide pre
that is a group
collaboration
team member
evident and th
peer reviews c
Slide presenta
· 6×6 bullet po
≥ 20 · Notes a
with each slid
Includes the r
number of slid
excluding Titl
Reference slid
count. · The p
uses appropria
or animation.
400 level Hallmark Rubric
Criteria
Ratings
This criterion is linked
to a Learning
OutcomeWriting and
APA Formatting
35 to >30.0 pts
Exemplary
Style and voice are
appropriate to the
given audience and
purpose, but also show
originality and
creativity. Word choice
is specific, purposeful,
dynamic, and varied.
Free of mechanical and
typographical errors. A
variety of sentence
structures and effective
figures of speech are
used. Writer is clearly
in command of
standard, written,
academic English.
APA 7th Edition
guidelines for
formatting are
consistently followed.
Includes in-text
citations and
references. May use
1st person writing as
appropriate with the
7th edition APA.
Total Points: 200
30 to >25.0 pts
Accomplished
Style and voice are
appropriate to the given
audience and purpose.
Word choice is specific
and purposeful, and
varied throughout.
Minimal (20.0 pts
Developing
Style and voice are
appropriate to given
audience and purpose.
Repetitive mechanical
or typographical errors
(>5 but 0 pts
Unsatisfactory Beginning
Style and voice a
appropriate to gi
audience and pu
Repetitive mech
typographical er
Inconsistencies i
sentence structur
word choice. Lac
elements require
a formal APA 7t
presentation/pap
page, references
citations. May us
person writing a
appropriate with
edition APA.

Purchase answer to see full
attachment

  
error: Content is protected !!