the point of the paper is to learn how to research… in one part of the paper we’re supposed to interview 3 people about the topic (FAMILY) including the paper rubric I uploaded and the other part You would be talking about your findings And for the 3 people that I’m “supposedly†interviewing you could just make up fake names.Basically finding different research about problems in families and use these interviewees to backup your research
ul Metro by T-Mobile
12:52 AM
@ @ 54%
Done
Paper Rubric.pdf
1 of 2
Paper Rubric
Requirements of submission: Paper assignments must follow these formatting guidelines: double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font,
one-inch margins, and discipline-appropriate citations. Page length requirements: Ten to 12 pages undergraduate courses. Failure to adhere to
these requirements of submission will result in the paper not being graded.
Instructor Feedback: Students can find their feedback in the grade book as an attachment.
Value
Critical Elements
A clear statement of
the problem
Emerging
Includes some of the main
elements and requirements
10
Not Evident
Does not include any of the
main elements and
requirements
Proficient
Includes most of the main
elements and requirements and
cites many examples to illustrate
each element
(7-8)
Provides in-depth analysis that
demonstrates complete
understanding of some concepts
(0-5)
Does not provide in-depth
analysis
Scope of the problem
with statistical data
15
Distinguished
Includes all of the main
elements and requirements
and cites multiple examples to
illustrate each element
(9-10)
Provides in-depth analysis that
demonstrates complete
understanding of multiple
concepts
(14-15)
All of the course concepts are
correctly applied
(9-10)
Draws insightful conclusions
that are thoroughly defended
with evidence and examples
(27-30)
Incorporates many scholarly
resources effectively that
reflect depth and breadth of
research
(9-10)
Sociological
Perspectives
15
(12-13)
Most of the course concepts are
correctly applied
(8)
Draws informed conclusions that
are justified with evidence
(6-7)
Provides in-depth analysis
that demonstrates complete
understanding of minimal
concepts
(9-11)
Some of the course concepts
are correctly applied
(7)
Draws logical conclusions,
but does not defend with
evidence
(17-22)
Incorporates very few
scholarly resources that
reflect depth and breadth of
research
(6-7)
(0-8)
Does not correctly apply any
of the course concepts
(0-6)
Does not draw logical
conclusions
Interview Findings
30
Research
10
(23-26)
Incorporates some scholarly
resources effectively that reflect
depth and breadth of research
(0-16)
Does not incorporate
scholarly resources that
reflect depth and breadth of
research
(7-8)
(0-5)
Does not draw logical
Solutions and
Draws insightful solutions and
Draws informed solutions and
Draws logical solutions and
20
onclusions
are justified
conclusions
conclusions
ughly conclusions
defended with evidence and evidence
examples
(23-26)
(27-30)
conclusions,
not
defend with evidence
(17-22)
(0-16)
Earned Total:
100%
Comments:
ch
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
