+1(978)310-4246 credencewriters@gmail.com
  

Description

solve task one work proposal by following the instructions..200 words.

the similarities most be less than 5

Artificial Intelligence (COMP 30024) –Spring – 21 – CW (Assignment-1) – All – QP
IN SEMESTER INDIVIDUAL ASSIGNMENT
Module Code: COMP 30024
Module Name: Artificial Intelligence
Level: 3
Max. Marks: 100
Instructions to Student
●
Answer all questions.
●
Deadline of submission: 21/04/2021 23:59
●
The marks received on the assignment will be scaled down to the actual weightage
of the assignment which is 50 marks
●
Formative feedback on the complete assignment draft will be provided if the draft is
submitted at least 10 days before the final submission date.
●
Feedback after final evaluation will be provided by 05/05/2021
Module Learning Outcomes
The following LOs are achieved by the student by completing the assignment successfully
1)
2)
Demonstrate an understanding of the concepts of Artificial Intelligence.
Apply the concept of rational agents to Artificial Intelligence.
Assignment Objective
The objective is to enable the student to carry out research reviews in gaining an understanding of
the concepts of Artificial Intelligence and problem solving abilities. Artificial Intelligence is a technical
module which exposes students to the vital concepts of building intelligent systems. Assignments are
designed to demonstrate the critical techniques related to building systems. Hence, student’s ability to
think and engage with the topic is tested.
Assignment Tasks
1) Task 1 – Submit a work proposal for this assignment on or before 05/04/2021 (23:59) which must
include:
● Understanding of deliverables – a detail description of deliverables.
( 4 Marks)
●
General overview of proposed plan – initial understanding of solution to all the tasks. (4 Marks)
●
Resources identified for completion of the given tasks. (2 Marks)
MEC_AMO_TEM_035_02
Page 1 of 11
Artificial Intelligence (COMP 30024) –Spring – 21 – CW (Assignment-1) – All – QP
The work proposal must be submitted in a word file through the link available in Moodle.
2)
Task 2 – Artificial Intelligence (AI) poses important challenges for physicians. An important debate
is between AI replaced or AI enhanced doctors. Read the research article given below and critically
reflect about this:
https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/2001/2001.09778.pdf
(Please note that the explanation should not reproduce the given statements, rather a critical
reflection is expected).
(10 Marks)
(Note: The entire task-2 should be between 100 to 150 words. Please plan for number of words
for each of the sub-tasks depending on the allocated marks).
3) Task 3 – Read the research article given below and answer the following questions:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6779111/
(Please note that the explanation should not reproduce the given statements, rather a brief
reflection is expected).
(i)
The impact and benefits of using Artificial Intelligence in medical or health care sector as
per the research article.
(15 Marks)
(ii)
The (a) impact of Artificial Intelligence in the field of radiology and (b) the future of
radiology with AI.
(10 marks each X 2 =20 Marks)
(Note: The entire task-3 should be between 500 to 550 words. Please plan for number of words
for each of the sub-tasks depending on the allocated marks).
4) Task 4 – Consider an ideal agent that can control traffic lights at a four way intersection wherein there
are 2 roads crossing with traffic flowing in all directions. There are red, yellow and green main lights and
a pedestrian indicator. Assume that the intersection has signals for pedestrians.
(i)
Describe such an agent in your own words by focusing on the Actions that can be
performed, the Percepts for the actions and the Performance Measures that can be
adopted.
(10 Marks)
MEC_AMO_TEM_035_02
Page 2 of 11
Artificial Intelligence (COMP 30024) –Spring – 21 – CW (Assignment-1) – All – QP
(ii)
Design a simulator for the agent described above, implement it using any programming language
of your choice that could be suitable for implementing ideal/intelligent agents and submit a
detailed report focusing on the screen design, snapshots of the code of the key logic, overall
working of the simulator.
(35 Marks)
(Note: The entire task-3 should be between 600 to 750 words. Please plan for number of words
for each of the sub-tasks depending on the allocated marks).
Rules & Regulations:
●
●
●
●
●
All resources should be cited using CU Harvard style.
The final assignment must have a Title page, Table of Contents, References/ bibliography using
CU Harvard Style and page numbers.
Title Page must have Assignment Name, Module name, Session, your name, ID, and the name of
the faculty.
Softcopy in word format is to be submitted through Turnitin link on Moodle.
Viva can be conducted depending on the need after the submission of assignment as per the dates
informed earlier.
Guidelines:
●
●
●
●
Assignment must be computer typed.
⮚
Font – Times New Roman
⮚
Font – Style – Regular
⮚
Font – Size – 12
⮚
Heading should be with Font Size 14, Bold, Capital and Underline.
Explain with suitable diagrams wherever required. Diagrams must be drawn using suitable
software or by pencil.
Each student has to do the assignment individually / Students have to do the assignment
collaboratively and each student should write a brief reflection on their contribution and learnings
from group work.
You can refer books in E-Library or use internet resource. But you should not cut and paste
material from internet nor provide photocopied material from books. The assignment answers
should be in your own words after understanding the matter from the above resources.
Assessment Evaluation Criteria
Classification
And % Range
Reflection and critical
analysis.
Outstanding
91-100
Highly
competent
analytical
skills
and
reflective
practice,
demonstrating
personal
learning
and
growth,
insight
into
required
professional values and
principles and professional
development planning.
MEC_AMO_TEM_035_02
Knowledge and
Understanding/
Application of Theory
Extensive knowledge and
depth of understanding of
principles and concepts
and /or outstanding
application of theory in
practice.
Evidence of Reading
Evidence of reading an
extensive range of
educational
literature/research and
where applicable
workplace strategies,
policies and procedures.
Referencing and
Bibliography
Accurate referencing and
bibliography correctly
using appropriate
referencing style
Presentation, Grammar
and Spelling
Excellent presentation,
logically structured, using
correct grammar and
spelling, excellent crossreferencing and links to
supporting evidence
Page 3 of 11
Artificial Intelligence (COMP 30024) –Spring – 21 – CW (Assignment-1) – All – QP
Excellent
81–90
Very Good Quality
71-80
Good (Acceptable)
61-70
Adequate/ Satisfactory
51-60
Weak /Poor
(all learning outcomes not
adequately met)
Strong analytical skills and
reflective practice used,
demonstrating
personal
learning
and
growth,
insight
into
required
professional
values,
principles
and
competencies
and
professional development
planning.
Good use of analytical skills
and reflective practice
demonstrating
personal
learning
and
growth,
insight
into
required
professional
values,
principles
and
competencies
and
professional development
planning.
Acceptable
use
of
analytical
skills
and
reflective
practice
demonstrating
personal
learning
and
growth,
insight
into
required
professional
values,
principles
and
competencies
and
professional development
planning.
Adequate use of analytical
skills and reflective practice
demonstrating
personal
learning
and
growth,
insight
into
required
professional
values,
principles
and
competencies
and
professional development
planning.
Little use of analytical skills
and reflective practice
demonstrating
personal
learning
and
growth,
insight
into
required
competencies
and/or
professional development
planning.
Professional
values and principles not
reflected
in
the
submission.
0-50
and/or
Insufficient/no use of
analytical
skills
and
reflective
practice
demonstrating
personal
learning
and
growth,
insight
into
required
competencies
and
professional development
planning
MEC_AMO_TEM_035_02
Excellent knowledge and
understanding of principles
and concepts and /or
excellent knowledge and
understanding
of the
application of theory in
practice
Evidence of reading a wide
range
of
educational
literature/research
and
where
applicable,
workplace
strategies,
policies and procedures.
Appropriate referencing
and bibliography correctly
using
appropriate
referencing style
Good
presentation,
competently structured,
using correct grammar and
spelling, clear and easy to
use links to supporting
evidence
Good knowledge or key
principles and concepts
and/or good knowledge of
the application of theory in
practice
Evidence of reading a good
range
of
educational
literature/research
and
where
applicable
workplace
strategies,
policies and procedures.
Generally well referenced
with correct use of the
appropriate
referencing
style
Reasonable presentation,
completely
structured,
acceptable grammar and
spelling, acceptable links to
supporting evidence
Acceptable knowledge of
key principles and concepts
and/or knowledge of the
application of theory in
practice
Evidence of reading an
appropriate
range of
educational
literature/research
and
where applicable, relevant
workplace policies and
procedures
Adequate
referencing.
Generally accurate use of
appropriate
referencing
style
Adequate
presentation
and structure, acceptable
grammar and spelling,
adequate
links
to
supporting evidence
Adequate knowledge of
key principles and concepts
and/or
satisfactory
evidence of the application
of theory in practice.
Evidence
of
minimal
reading
of educational
literature/research
and
where applicable relevant
workplace policies and
procedures
Adequate
referencing.
Appropriate referencing
style used but may contain
some inaccuracies.
Weak
presentation
,
satisfactory
structure,
grammar and spelling, links
to supporting evidence
Little evidence of
knowledge of key
principles or concepts
and/or little evidence of
the application of theory in
practice
Little or no evidence of
reading outside of the
course textbook and/or
reference to relevant work
place policies and
procedures
Little or no referencing,
incorrect style, or very
inaccurate use of
appropriate referencing
style
Poor presentation,
grammar and spelling,
links to supporting
evidence
and/or
and/or
No evidence of knowledge
of key principles or
concepts and/or no
evidence of application of
theory in practice
No evidence of reading
outside of the course
textbook and/or reference
to relevant workplace
policies and procedures
and/or
Unacceptable
presentation, grammar
and spelling, structure is
very poor, links to
supporting evidence
Page 4 of 11
Artificial Intelligence (COMP 30024) –Spring – 21 – CW (Assignment-1) – All – QP
Marking Grid:
MODULE NAME: Artificial Intelligence (COMP 30024)
Evaluation Grid Sheet – Assignment-1 (Max Marks = 100)
Student ID:
Task 1 (Work
Proposal)
Student Name:
0-3
4-7
No Submission imply
zero marks; Weak
proposal covering some
of the points
Task 2:
Reflection on
(AI) pose
important
challenges for
physicians
0–3
8-10
Reasonably good proposal
covering the understanding
of tasks, schedule and
resources identified.
4-7
Well-written proposal
covering all the tasks
identified in the proposal.
8-10
Reproducing the given
definition/weak
reflection
Loosely presented
Reflection of about 100 to
150 words with proper
citation.
Well written reflection of
about 100 to 150 words
with proper citation.
Task 3: i
0–4
5-10
11-15
Reflection on
benefits of using
Artificial
Intelligence in
medical
Very weak reflection
Loosely presented
Reflection of about 200 to
250 words with proper
citation.
Well written reflection of
about 200 to 250 words
with proper citation.
0–3
4-7
8-10
Very weak reflection
Loosely presented
Reflection of about 150 to
200 words with proper
citation.
Well written reflection of
about 150 to 200 words
with proper citation.
0–3
4-7
8-10
Task 3: ii (a)
Reflection on
impact of
Artificial
Intelligence in
radiology
Task 3: ii (b)
MEC_AMO_TEM_035_02
Mark
Mark
Mark
Mark
Mark
Page 5 of 11
Artificial Intelligence (COMP 30024) –Spring – 21 – CW (Assignment-1) – All – QP
Reflection on
future of
radiology with
AI
Task 4i
Very weak reflection
0–3
Loosely presented
Reflection of about 150 to
200 words with proper
citation.
Well written reflection of
about 150 to 200 words
with proper citation.
4-7
8-10
Description of agent
covering actions,
perceptron and
performance
measure.
Covering only actions/
only perceptron/only
performance measure
Loosely presented
Description covering all
the three items
Well written description
of about 120 to 150
words with proper
citation.
Task 4: i i
0 – 20
21-30
31-35
Well designed interface
and most of the identified
operations implemented.
Professional level of
implementation with
appropriate explanation
Implementation of
the agent
Well designed interface,
few of the identified
operations implemented.
Mark
Mark
Total Marks
Penalty
Final Marks
Examiner sign:
Feedback: _____________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
Important Policies to be followed
1. Student Academic Integrity Policy*:
●
MEC upholds the spirit of academic integrity in all forms of academic work and any form of
violation of academic integrity shall invite severe penalty. Any benefit obtained by indulging
in the act of violation of academic integrity shall be cancelled.
●
MEC also reserves the right to notify the appropriate law enforcement authorities of any
unlawful activity and to cooperate thereafter in any investigation of such activity.
●
Faculty can conduct a viva to investigate and ascertain that the work submitted is student’s
own work as per the guidelines for the same. A student can be given a maximum of 2
MEC_AMO_TEM_035_02
Page 6 of 11
Artificial Intelligence (COMP 30024) –Spring – 21 – CW (Assignment-1) – All – QP
chances to attend the viva in such cases. It is expected that the student attends the viva
during the first chance itself unless due to extenuating circumstances. If the student does
not attend the viva in spite of being given 2 chances and fails to submit valid reasons,
he/she will be awarded a fail in the module and this shall be counted as a case of academic
integrity violation.
All cases of violation of academic integrity on the part of the student shall fall under any of the below
mentioned categories:
1.
Plagiarism
2.
Malpractice
3.
Ghost Writing
4.
Collusion
5.
Other cases
If the student fails a module and has a proven case of academic integrity violation in this module,
the student is required to re-register the module. This is applicable to first and second offence of
academic integrity violation of plagiarism type
1.1. First Offence of Academic Integrity Violation:
1.1.1. Plagiarism
a. If a student is caught first time in an act of academic integrity violation during
his/her course of study in any assignment other than project work and if the type
of violation is plagiarism, then the student will be allowed to re-submit the
assignment once as per the period allowed for re submission However, a penalty
of deduction of 25% of the marks obtained for the resubmitted work will be
imposed.
b.
Period of re-submission: The student will have to re-submit the work within one
week (5 working days) from the date he or she is advised to re-submit.
c.
Re-submission of the work beyond the allowed period of resubmission will not be
accepted and the assessment will be awarded a zero mark.
d.
If the re-submitted work (within the allowed period of resubmission) is also found
to be plagiarized, then that assessment component will be awarded a zero mark.
It shall also contribute to the total count of academic integrity violation for that
student.
MEC_AMO_TEM_035_02
Page 7 of 11
Artificial Intelligence (COMP 30024) –Spring – 21 – CW (Assignment-1) – All – QP
e.
If plagiarism is detected in UG Project work (Project 1, Project Planning and Project
Design and Implementation), the above clauses do not apply, and the work will be
summarily rejected. In these cases the student will be awarded a fail (F) grade and
is required to reregister the module.
1.1.2. Malpractice / Ghostwriting / Collusion
If a student is caught first time in an act academic integrity violation during his/her course
of study for an assessment component irrespective of coursework or end semester and
if the type of violation is Malpractice/Ghostwriting/Collusion, then the student shall fail
the module.
1.2. Second Offence of Academic Integrity Violation:
1.2.1. Plagiarism
a. If any student is caught second time in an act of academic integrity violation during
his/her course of study and if the type of violation is plagiarism, then the student
will not be allowed to resubmit the work, and s/he will directly be awarded zero
for the work in which plagiarism is detected.
b.
The student shall also receive a warning of suspension in such cases.
1.2.2. Malpractice/Ghostwriting/Collusion
a. If a student is caught a second time in an act academic integrity violation for an
assessment component irrespective of coursework or end semester and if the type
of violation is Malpractice/Ghostwriting/Collusion, then the student shall fail the
module.
b.
The student shall also receive a warning of suspension in such cases.
1.3. Third Offence of Academic Integrity Violation:
a.
b.
c.
d.
MEC_AMO_TEM_035_02
If a student is caught a third time in an act of academic integrity violation for an
assessment component irrespective of coursework or end semester then the student
shall fail the module and also shall be suspended for one semester from the College,
once the academic integrity violation case is confirmed by Institutional Assessment
Review Committee.
The student shall be suspended for the immediate subsequent semester and can
register for modules only after having served the suspension period fully. This is also
applicable for semesters offered in block mode.
During the suspension period, the student shall have to mandatorily complete a course
on academic integrity/writing before s/he can register for any modules.
During the period of suspension, the student shall be allowed to attempt
supplementary examinations if s/he is eligible for the same. S/he shall also be allowed
access to all college facilities permitted for a regular student except for registering the
modules.
Page 8 of 11
Artificial Intelligence (COMP 30024) –Spring – 21 – CW (Assignment-1) – All – QP
1.4. Fourth Offence of Academic Integrity Violation:
a.
If a student is caught a fourth time in an act of academic integrity violation for an
assessment component irrespective of coursework or end semester, the student shall
fail the module and also shall be expelled from the College, once the case is confirmed
by Institutional Assessment Review Committee.
b.
The student shall be expelled from the college and all access to the college facilities
and premises shall cease to exist. The documents shall be released only after getting
the NOC (No Objection Certificate) from Registration Office.
c.
`On termination, the student shall not be refunded any fees paid for the academic
semester in which academic integrity violation was observed.
1.5. Other cases
If a student commits an act of academic integrity violation as per the definition of “other
cases” mentioned in the previous section or of a different nature, student’s case shall be
forwarded to an Institutional Assessment Review Committee, Chaired by the Associate
Dean, Academic Affairs. The committee shall investigate the case by means of a viva and/or
a hearing of the parties concerned if required and shall take appropriate decision. The
penalty that can be granted to a proven case of academic integrity violation which falls in
this category of “other cases” can be a warning/component zero/ module
fail/suspension/expulsion depending on the nature and gravity of the offence.
1.6. Types/Variations of cases of Plagiarism and associated actions
Type 1: In case plagiarism is detected in any component or part submission (submitted at
different times) of one assessment (assignment), the deduction in marks will be applicable
for the whole assessment (assignment), even if only the component or part submission alone
needs to be resubmitted.
Type 2: In case plagiarism is detected in a group assessment, all students of the group will be
considered as having committed an act of plagiarism irrespective of whether plagiarism is on
account of the act of all or a few or only one member. The policy will then be applied to all
students.
If some students in the group are eligible to re-submit (first offence) and others are not
eligible, only eligible students will be allowed to re-submit within a period of one week and
the penalty will be applied as per the policy for each student according to his / her history of
violations.
Type 3: Combination of Type 1 and Type 2: In case plagiarism is detected in any component
or part submission (submitted at different times) of a group assessment (assignment), the
deduction in marks will be applicable for the whole assessment (assignment), even if only the
component or part submission alone needs to be resubmitted. All students of the group
would be considered as having committed an act of plagiarism irrespective of whether
plagiarism is on account of the act of all or a few or only one member. The policy will then be
applied to all the students of the group.
If some students in the group are eligible to re-submit (first offence) and others are not
eligible, only eligible students will be allowed to re-submit within a period of one week and
MEC_AMO_TEM_035_02
Page 9 of 11
Artificial Intelligence (COMP 30024) –Spring – 21 – CW (Assignment-1) – All – QP
the penalty will be applied as per the policy for each student according to his / her history of
violation.
Type 4: Variation of Type 1 and Type 2: In cases where the assessment consists of
components or part submissions that could be a group assessment component (e.g. group
assignment) and an individual assessment component (e.g. individual reflection), the
following will be applicable:
a. If plagiarism is detected in the group assessment component, all students of the group will
be considered as having committed an act of plagiarism, irrespective of whether plagiarism
is on account of the act of all or a few or only one member. The policy will then be applied to
all students of the group. In such cases the group assessment component will be resubmitted.
If some students in the group are eligible to re-submit (first offence) and others are not
eligible, only eligible students will be allowed to re-submit within a period of one week and
the penalty will be applied for each student according to his / her history of violation.
b. If plagiarism is detected in the individual assessment component, the individual assessment
component will be resubmitted – if the student is eligible for resubmission-. The policy will
then be applied to that student alone.
c. In both cases (a) and/or (b), the deduction in marks will be applicable for the whole
assessment (assignment).
1.7. Types/Variation of Cases of Multiple Offences
If student is caught with multiple violations of same or different nature in different modules
of the same semester, they will be considered as one offence and student will be penalized
for each violation according to the type of the offence.
If student is caught with multiple violations of same or different nature in the same module
of the same semester, then they will be considered as different offences and each will
contribute to the overall count of AIV. The student then shall be penalized for each violation
according to the count and type of each offence.
* For further details Refer to MEC Student Academic Integrity Policy in Student Handbook.
2. Late Submission Regulations:
It is the students’ responsibility to check all relevant timelines related to assessments.
As per the Assessment Policy at MEC, late submissions are allowed for one week (5 working days)
for all UG modules with a penalty. In such cases, a deduction of 5% of the marks obtained for the
submitted work shall be imposed for each working day following the last date of submission
till the date of actual submission. Assessment documents submitted beyond a period of one
week (5 working days) after the last date of submission will not be accepted and will be awarded
a zero for that assessment. In cases where the submission has been delayed due to extenuating
MEC_AMO_TEM_035_02
Page 10 of 11
Artificial Intelligence (COMP 30024) –Spring – 21 – CW (Assignment-1) – All – QP
circumstances, the student may be permitted to submit the work without imposing the late
submission policy stated above. The extended period of submission will be one week from the
original last date of submission. In such cases, the student is expected to submit the supporting
certificates on or before the original last date of submission of the assessment and the decision
of extension rests with faculty responsible for the assessment .The late submission policy shall be
applied if the student fails to submit the work within one week of the original last date of
submission.
Students may contact their teachers for clarification on specific details of the submission time if
required.
3. Research Ethics and Biosafety Policy
To protect and respect the rights, dignity, health, safety, and privacy of research subjects involved
including the welfare of animals and the integrity of environment, all student projects are
expected to be undertaken as per the MEC Research Ethics and Biosafety Policy. Accordingly the
following shall apply.
●
Research and other enterprise activities shall be conducted by maintaining the high ethical
standards consistent with national and international standards and conventions.
●
Any research at MEC that is categorized as high-risk research shall be subject to review and
approval by the Research Ethics and Biosafety Committee.
●
Research activities involving collection of human or animal tissues and manipulation of microbial,
animal or plant cells shall be subject to review and approval by the Research Ethics and Biosafety
Committee.
●
Participants involved in research must be informed about the purpose of research and intended
uses of research findings. Written consent must be obtained from people involved prior to the
commencement of research.
●
Data obtained from participants must be treated with high confidence and should be used only
for the intended purpose of research.
MEC_AMO_TEM_035_02
Page 11 of 11

Purchase answer to see full
attachment

  
error: Content is protected !!