+1(978)310-4246 credencewriters@gmail.com
  

Description

FIN 610 Milestone Three Guidelines and Rubric
Overview: In Milestone Two, you evaluated the recent cash flow and other working capital cash flow management practices of the two firms for your final
project. For this last milestone, which is due in Module Seven, you will now evaluate the liquidity and financial ratios of both companies; using the financial ratio
calculations you make, you will identify the strengths and weakness of each firm.
Prompt: Review your work on Milestones One and Two, read Chapter 2 in your textbook on working capital ratios and other metrics, and then, in a 2- to 3-page
paper, analyze the activity, financial leverage, liquidity, profitability, and market ratios for each company you are researching for your final project. Conclude
your paper by discussing each firm’s strengths and weaknesses.
The following critical elements must be addressed:
III.
Evaluation of the Firms
C. Evaluate both companies’ liquidity. Cite specific examples and figures that support your evaluation.
D. Calculate both companies’ financial ratios:
1. Activity ratios, including inventory turnover ratios
2. Debt ratios (financial leverage)
3. Profitability and market ratios
E. Using the financial ratio calculations above, identify strengths and weaknesses for each firm, citing specific examples and figures to support your
response.
As you work on this milestone, consider the recommendations you will make in your final project submission to improve the weaknesses you identified in each
firm. Be sure to incorporate instructor feedback in your final project, which is due in Module Nine.
Rubric
Guidelines for Submission: Milestone Three should be a 2- to 3-page Microsoft Word document, double-spaced, using 12-point Times New Roman font, oneinch margins, and APA formatting for citations.
Critical Elements
Proficient (100%)
Evaluation of the Evaluates both companies’ liquidity,
Firms: Liquidity citing specific examples and figures to
support the evaluation
Needs Improvement (75%)
Not Evident (0%)
Value
Evaluates both companies’ liquidity, but Does not evaluate both
evaluation is illogical or contains
companies‘ liquidity
inaccuracies, or specific examples and
figures are not appropriate or are
nonexistent
18
Evaluation of the Accurately calculates the activity ratios Calculates the activity ratios for both
Does not calculate the activity
Firms: Financial for both companies, including inventory companies, including inventory turnover ratios for both companies
Ratios: Activity turnover ratios
ratios, but calculations contain
inaccuracies
18
Evaluation of the Accurately calculates the debt ratio for Calculates the debt ratio for both
Firms: Financial both companies
companies, but calculations contain
Ratios: Debt
inaccuracies
Ratio
Does not calculate the debt ratio
for both companies
18
Evaluation of the Accurately calculates the profitability
Firms: Financial and market ratios for both companies
Ratios:
Profitability
Calculates the profitability and market
ratios for both companies, but
calculations contain inaccuracies
Does not calculate the profitability
and market ratios for both
companies
18
Evaluation of the Identifies strengths and weaknesses for
Firms: Strengths each firm based on the financial ratio
and Weaknesses calculations, citing specific examples
and figures to support response
Identifies strengths and weaknesses for Does not identify strengths and
each firm based on the financial ratio
weaknesses for each firm based
calculations, but response lacks clarity or on financial ratio calculations
is missing elements, or specific examples
and figures are not relevant or are
nonexistent
Articulation of Submission has no major errors related Submission has major errors related to
Response
to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or
or organization
organization that negatively impact
readability and articulation of main ideas
Submission has critical errors
related to citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, or organization
that prevent understanding of
ideas
Total
18
10
100%

Purchase answer to see full
attachment

  
error: Content is protected !!