+1(978)310-4246 credencewriters@gmail.com
  

I’m working on a social science multi-part question and need an explanation and answer to help me learn.

Case Study: “Benefit Maximization,” and “Equal Respect” Template for Activity 3.1
Directions:
The candidate is to read pages 14 – 16. Up until this point in the case study, we have
concentrated on good ole’ school administration logic and the law. Let’s take another approach.
And based on morals and ethical principles. In the 3rd paragraph on page 16, the authors
propose a working hypothesis, “That moral arguments and moral discussion have a valid
function in our lives and in our institutions.”
a. What does this statement mean to you (p. 16)? “That moral arguments and moral discussion
have a valid function in our lives and in our institutions.”
b.1. In your own words describe The Principle of Benefit Maximization. (in 1 to 3 sentences)
b.2. In your own words describe The Principle of Equal Respect in terms of the “Golden Rule” and its
three subsidiary ideas. (Maybe 150 – 225 words)
c.1. After reading the “CONCLUSION” on pages 18 and 19 of the textbook, tell how one might resolve
the case when taking a “consequentialist” view.
c.2. After reading the “CONCLUSION” on pages 18 and 19 of the textbook, tell how one would resolve
the case when taking a “non-consequentialist” view.
c.3. After reading the “CONCLUSION” on pages 18 and 19 of the textbook, which view would you
recommend for resolving this case and why?

Purchase answer to see full
attachment

  
error: Content is protected !!