+1(978)310-4246 credencewriters@gmail.com
  

Description

my topic is drugs in Nogales, Arizona

I want help writing the report that I will submit to the police. The report format is in the attached file.

use the SARA model and the crime triangle

.

You need to conduct accurate and in-depth research and analysis of the problem, find solutions and evaluate them. And please adhere to all instructions and the rubric.

PROBLEM-SOLVING REPORT FORMAT
PROBLEM-SOLVING REPORT FORMAT
D R. MA MD OO H A . A BD E L MOTT LE P
JAN UA RY 2 021
Ideally, a Problem-Solving Report is akin to a decision memorandum. A Problem-Solving
Report must be thoroughly researched and be richly accompanied by endnotes.
A good Problem-Solving Report will have the following parts.
1. Executive Summary
A short abstract of the paper content including all the Problem-Solving Report parts.
2. Problem Background
A. History of the Problem
B. Current Status of the Problem
C. Importance of the Problem
D. Definition of the Problem
Introduction to the problem. Keep it short and to the point. This section frames the issue.
3. Problem Statement
A. Identify the objectives of the entity that is trying to solve the problem and the
Statement of the Problem
B. Statement of Methodology Used in Analysis
C. Identification of Actors Involved
D. Impact of the Problem
It concisely identifies the problem to be solved. It may be in the form of a question.
4. Alternative Solutions
A. Listing of Alternatives Considered
B. Comparison of Alternatives
1
PROBLEM-SOLVING REPORT FORMAT
C. Constraints, Including Political
Enumerate the options and describe them briefly. It is common to provide three options,
but don’t force it to that. For and against arguments do not constitute two options. Give
the decision-maker some choices.
4-D: Analysis of Options: How does each option serve the objectives listed above (3-A)
and what are the other cost issues associated with each. Consider positive and negative
externalities. You should be sensitive to the options’ domestic political repercussions.
5. Recommendations
A. Description Recommendation(s)
B. Rationale for Recommendations
C. Plan for Implementation
D. Provisions for Monitoring/Evaluation
Select the best option and recapitulate why it is the best. Do a reality check. Does the
recommendation solve the problem; is it actionable? Your recommendation should
ideally be a stand-alone, and not require another iteration of the process to figure out
how to implement it. A good recommendation is never a suicide pact.
6. References
7. Appendices
2
X O
+
X 2021032: S
X 2021032 S
x 2021032 S
X SOLUTIOS
X Dashboar S
X 2021032 W
X Inbox (8
M
X 2021032 W
☆
studypool.com/uploads/questions/1592213/20210325195209screenshot_2021_03_25_at_10.50.37_pm.png
X
Chrome – Rubric Detail – Problem Solving: Planning, Analysis and
Bb
Ims.kfsc.edu.sa/webapps/rubric/do/course/gradeRubric?mode=grid&isPopup=true&rubricCount=1&prefix=_26246_1&course_id=_2517_1&maxValue=100.0&rubricid=_2820_1&view… .
EXIE
Description: This rubric includes all CVILOs and should be used to assess the ePortfolio Project
Grid View
List View
Unsatisfactory
Baseline
Developing
Good
Exemplary
1.1 Description
9.99999 (9.99999%) –
11.1111 (11.1111%)
0 (0.00%) -6.55555
(6.55554%)
No potential problem
identified.
6.66666 (6.66666%) –
7.66666 (7.66665%)
One feature of a
potential problem
discussed.
7.77777 (7.77777%) –
8.77777 (8.77776%)
Describe multiple
features of a potential
problem
8.88888 (8.8888896) –
9.88888 (9.888879)
…and explain
consequences to
stakeholders
…and discuss
administrative
constraints affecting
MOI engagement
1.2 Support
0 (0.00%) – 6.55555
(6.55554%)
6.66666 (6.66666%) –
7.66666 (7.66665%)
7.77777 (7.77777%) –
8.77777 (8.77776%)
Multiple sources cited
8.88888 (8.888889) –
9.88888 (9.888879)
…and quality of
sources described
No sources cited.
One source cited.
9.99999 (9.99999%) –
11.1111 (11.1111%)
…and relevance of
sources to specifics of
the problem discussed
to produce a coherent
justification
2.1 Data
0 (0.00%) -6.55555
(6.55554%)
No datasets identified.
8.88888 (8.88888%) –
9.88888 (9.888879)
6.66666 (6.66666%) –
7.66666 (7.66665%)
Identify one relevant
dataset.
7.77777 (7.77777%) –
8.77777 (8.77776%)
Identify multiple
relevant datasets
…and aggregate into a
single coherent data
structure
9.99999 (9.99999%) –
11.1111 (11.1111%)
…and explain quality
with reference to
missing data outliers,
and relevant
metadata.
2.2 Analysis
0 (0.00%) – 6.55555
6.66666 (6.66666%) –
7.77777 (7.77777%) –
8.88888 (8.88888%) –
9.99999 (9.999999) –
X O
+
X 2021032519 S
X 2021032519 S
X SOLUTION: S
x Dashboard
S
x 2021032603 W * Inbox (8) – al M
X 2021032316 W
☆
studypool.com/uploads/questions/1592213/20210325195203screenshot_2021_03_25_at_10.50.44_pm.png
X
Chrome – Rubric Detail – Problem Solving: Planning, Analysis and
Bb
Ims.kfsc.edu.sa/webapps/rubric/do/course/grade Rubric?mode=grid&isPopup=true&rubricCount=1&prefix=-26246_1&course_id=_2517_1&maxValue=100.0&rubricid=_2820_1&view. .
2.2 Analysis
0 (0.00%) -6.55555
(6.55554%)
No analytical approach
identified.
6.66666 (6.66666%) –
7.66666 (7.666659)
Describe one
analytical approach.
7.77777 (7.77777%) –
8.77777 (8.77776%)
Describe multiple
analytical approaches
8.88888 (8.88888%) –
9.88888 (9.888879)
…and generate
appropriate
representations of
results
9.99999 (9.99999%) –
11.1111 (11.1111%)
…describing any
patterns and
correlations in the
data
3.1 Insight
0 (0.00%) -6.55555
(6.55554%)
6.66666 (6.66666%) –
7.66666 (7.666659)
One insight derived
from analysis
7.77777 (7.77777%) –
8.77777 (8.77776%)
Multiple insights
derived from analysis
No insights derived.
8.88888 (8.88888%) –
9.88888 (9.888879)
…and supported with
reference to the
literature
9.99999 (9.99999%) –
11.1111 (11.1111%)
…and any limitations
in data or analysis that
may affect validity of
interpretations
discussed.
^la
ا نظام تشغيل Chrome – الان
3.2 Proposal
5555جنة الثقافية الشاشة
الع55549 المجلد
6.66666 (6.66666%) –
7.66666 (7.66665%)
Plan with one element
proposed
7.77777 (7.77777%) –
8.77777 (8.77776%)
Plan with multiple
elements proposed
8.88888 (8.88888%) –
9.88888 (9.88887%)
that includes clearly
detailed specifications
No plan proposed.
9.99999 (9.99999%) –
11.1111 (11.11119)
…and discusses
feasibility within
context of Mol policy
and resourcing
4.1 Cogency
0 (0.00%) -6.55555
(6.55554%)
6.66666 (6.66666%) –
7.66666 (7.666659)
No apparent
organization of ideas.
One link between
ideas is clear
7.77777 (7.77777%) –
8.77777 (8.77776%)
Links among ideas
make message clear
and easy to follow
8.88888 (8.88888%) –
9.88888 (9.888879)
.and provide
focused, relevant,
explanation and
support to the
argument
9.99999 (9.99999%) –
11.1111 (11.1111%)
…and frame the
argument within the
context of a broader
discourse.
4.2 Template
äbolbyb:e0% -6.55555
(6.55554%)
6.66666 (6.66666%) –
7.66666 (7.6666596)
7.77777 (7.77777%) –
8.77777 (8.77776%)
8.88888 (8.888889) –
9.88888 (9.88887%)
9.99999 (9.99999%) –
11.1111 (11.1111%)
X O
+
X 2021032519515
S
X SOLUTION: prob S
X Dashboard
S
x 2021032603343 W
X Inbox (8) – alarifi: M
X 2021032316011 W
☆
studypool.com/uploads/questions/1592213/20210325195156 screenshot_2021_03_25_at_10.50.58_pm.png
Bb
X
Chrome – Rubric Detail – Problem Solving: Planning, Analysis and
Ims.kfsc.edu.sa/webapps/rubric/do/course/gradeRubric?mode=grid&isPopup=true&rubricCount=1&prefix=_26246_1&course_id=_2517_1&maxValue=100.0&rubricid=_2820_1&view… .
and resourcing
4.1 Cogency
6.66666 (6.66666%) –
7.66666 7.666659)
7.77777 (7.77777%) –
8.77777 (8.77776%)
0 (0.00%) – 6.55555
(6.55554%)
No apparent
organization of ideas,
One link between
ideas is clear.
Links among ideas
make message clear
and easy to follow
8.88888 (8.88888%) –
9.88888 (9.8888796)
…and provide
focused, relevant,
explanation and
support to the
argument
9.99999 (9.99999%) –
11.1111 (11.1111%)
…and frame the
argument within the
context of a broader
discourse.
4.2 Template
0 (0.00%) – 6.55555
(6.55554%)
6.66666 (6.6666696) –
7.66666 7.66665%)
Irregular observance
of a limited range of
standards.
7.77777 (7.77777%) –
8.77777 (8.77776%)
Regular observance of
all common standards
8.88888 (8.8888896) –
9.88888 (9.888879)
… with demonstrated
attention to detail
No apparent
observance of
standards.
9.99999 (9.9999996) –
11.1111 (11.1111%)
…and skillful
adaptation to specific
contexts.
4.3 Style
0 (0.00%) – 6.55561
(6.5556%)
No apparent
observance of
standard conventions
of formal written style.
6.66672 (6.66672%) –
7.66673 (7.666729)
Irregular observance
of the most obvious
and common
conventions of formal
written style.
7.77784 (7.77784%) –
8.77785 (8.77784%)
Consistent observance
of most conventions of
formal written style
8.88896 (8.88896%) –
9.88897 (9.88896%)
…with word choice
appropriate to the
intended audience
10.00008 (10.00008%) –
11.1112 (11.1112%)
…and constructions
displaying variety
suitability and fluency.
Exit
Name:Problem Solving: All CILOS
Description:This rubric includes all CVILOs and should be used to assess the ePortfolio Project

Purchase answer to see full
attachment

  
error: Content is protected !!