Description
1-Read the rubric carefully . 2- APA style 7 edition. 3- No plagiarism . 4- be patient with me sometimes need clarify
MGT520
Critical Thinking Writing Rubric – Module X
Exceeds
Expectation
Content, Research, and Analysis
21-25 Points
Requirements
Exceeds
Expectation
-Includes all of the
required
components as
specified in the
assignment.
25-30 Points
Content
Exceeds
Expectation Demonstrates
substantial and
extensive
knowledge of the
materials with no
errors or major
omissions.
25-30 Points
Analysis
Exceeds
Expectation Provides strong
thought, insight,
and analysis of
concepts and
applications.
13-15 Points
Sources
Exceeds
Expectation Sources go above
and beyond
required criteria,
and are well
chosen to provide
effective
substance and
perspectives on
the issue under
examination.
Mechanics and Writing
5 Points
Demonstrates
Exceeds
college-level
Expectation –
Meets Expectation
Below Expectation
Limited Evidence
16-20 Points
Meets
Expectation-Includ
es most of the
required
components as
specified in the
assignment.
19-24 Points
Meets
Expectation-Demo
nstrates adequate
knowledge of the
materials; may
include some
minor errors or
omissions.
11-15 Points
Below
Expectation-Includ
es some of the
required
components as
specified in the
assignment.
13-18 Points
Below
Expectation-Demo
nstrates fair
knowledge of the
materials and/or
includes some
major errors or
omissions.
6-10 Points
Limited Evidence Includes few of the
required
components as
specified in the
assignment.
19-24 Points
Meets
Expectation-Provid
es adequate
thought, insight,
and analysis of
concepts and
applications.
10-12 Points
Meets ExpectationSources meet
required criteria
and are adequately
chosen to provide
substance and
perspectives on
the issue under
examination.
13-18 Points
Below ExpectationProvides poor
thought, insight,
and analysis of
concepts and
applications.
7-12 Points
Limited Evidence Provides little or
no thought,
insight, and
analysis of
concepts and
applications.
4-6 Points
Limited Evidence Source selection
and integration of
knowledge from
the course is
clearly deficient.
4 Points
Meets
Expectation-Projec
3 Points
Below
Expectation-Projec
7-9 Points
Below ExpectationSources meet
required criteria,
but are poorly
chosen to provide
substance and
perspectives on
the issue under
examination.
7-12 Points
Limited Evidence Fails to
demonstrate
knowledge of the
materials and/or
includes many
major errors or
omissions.
1-2 Points
Limited Evidence Project is not
MGT520
Critical Thinking Writing Rubric – Module X
proficiency in
organization,
grammar and
style.
Project is clearly
organized, well
written, and in
proper format as
outlined in the
assignment.
Strong sentence
and paragraph
structure; contains
no errors in
grammar, spelling,
APA style, or APA
citations and
references.
Total points possible = 105
t is fairly well
organized and
written, and is in
proper format as
outlined in the
assignment.
Reasonably good
sentence and
paragraph
structure; may
include a few
minor errors in
grammar, spelling,
APA style, or APA
citations and
references.
t is poorly
organized and
written, and may
not follow proper
format as outlined
in the assignment.
Inconsistent to
inadequate
sentence and
paragraph
development,
and/or includes
numerous or major
errors in grammar,
spelling, APA style,
or APA citations
and references.
organized or well
written, and is not
in proper format as
outlined in the
assignment. Poor
quality work;
unacceptable in
terms of grammar,
spelling, APA style,
and APA citations
and references.
Scenario
Suzan has worked for Organization ABC for one year. During her 30-day review, Suzan received
amazing scores from her supervisor. During her 60-day review, Suzan’s performance was
deemed as acceptable, but her ability to communicate with her colleagues was lacking. During
Suzan’s 90-day review, Suzan’s supervisor, at the time, expressed that her performance needed
serious improvements. Unfortunately, Suzan’s supervisor noted the following:
1. Suzan did not provide her colleagues with messages from customers and vendors.
2. Suzan’s phone skills were ineffective, especially when interacting with customers.
3. Suzan’s temper was a concern and she often raised her voice when she became frustrated.
You have been hired to replace Suzan’s previous supervisor. Between Suzan’s 90-day review
and presently (her annual review), you have noticed that Suzan’s performance still is a problem.
Before her departure from the organization, Suzan’s past supervisor stated, “Suzan is nice;
however, she is a horrible communicator. I cannot work with her, as she is such a challenge to
deal with… Good luck, as Suzan is one of the worst employees of Organization ABC.â€Â
During your first week in your new role as supervisor, you met with Suzan to understand more
about her performance. She stated, “I am a hard worker; however, I only was told what I was
doing wrong. I am willing to learn. Can you help me become the best employee for Organization
ABC? I want to succeed in this role.â€Â
As a supervisor, you know that you have various responsibilities. One of your responsibilities is
to address performance deficiencies. Although Suzan was provided with a job description, which
included detailed information about the critical nature of communication in her role, she needs
additional support.
Examine pages 79 and 80 in your textbook. Then, create a plan, specific to Suzan’s needs,
detailing how you will utilize the following to ensure improved performance:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Observation and documentation
Updates
Feedback
Resources
Reinforcement
For example, when thinking about observation and documentation, what might you do to keep
track of Suzan’s performance? Why? When thinking about updates, how will you keep Suzan
updated? Explain and justify your rationale for each of the five components and why you made
the recommendations that you provided.
Your well-written paper should meet the following requirements:
•
Be 4-6 pages in length, which does not include the title and reference pages, which are
never a part of the content minimum requirements.
•
•
Use academic writing standards and APA 7 style guidelines.
Support your submission with course material concepts, principles and theories from
the textbook and at least two scholarly, peer-reviewed journal articles.
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
