Description
Please follow the instruction and the rubric to do it. The similarity rate do not higher than 10%
Foundations of Business Analysis –Business Analysis and Complexity
Overview and Rationale
In order to demonstrate proficiency with the content in this course we will complete a number of different assignments to validate
your learning – and allow you to implement relevant practices a real-world setting.
Learning Objectives
•
•
•
•
Create the Business Analysis Plan
Compare and describe the core tools and techniques that can be leveraged in the business analysis lifecycle.
Organize and structure a proactive approach to planning which ensure that all critical components of the business analysis process
are incorporated into the structured plan
Address complexity though application of the BA Framework
Essential Components
For this assignment, use insights from the Pulse of the Profession: Navigating Complexity. Based on your reading and the
insights gained this week, identify – for each category of complexity – specific issues to be addressed. Then, using the format
of the Business Analysis Plan, determine how this plan can be used to address the project’s complexity elements. You may
choose how to document your assignment. The following table shows the minimum requirements for the assignment:
Complexity Characteristic
Provide explanation for why this was
chosen and how it affects this project
What sections of the BAP can help
address this complexity?
Include the Section(s) and an
explanation for how it will be focused
to aid in dealing with this complexity
characteristic.
#1
#2
#3
#4
#5
…
Then, use your work from above to summarize in this table:
Business Analysis Plan
•
Elicitation Plan
•
Analysis Plan (Lists
deliverables)
Recommendations for what to include in this section to address Complexity
Analysis (This is a summary across the 5 complexity characteristics for each
section of the BAP)
•
Requirements Prioritization
Process
•
Requirements Prioritization
Process
•
Traceability Approach
•
Communication Approach
•
Requirements
Verification/Validation
Processes
•
Requirements Change
Management Process
•
•
Solution Evaluation Process
Assignment Rubric
Category
Above Standard
Meets Standards
Approaching
Standards
Below Standards
Not
Evident
Assignment
requirements
(70%)
Goes well above the
requirements of the
assignment.
Provides new
information, tools,
and/or techniques
Goes above the
minimum
requirements of the
assignment
Meets minimum
assignment
requirements
Meets some
assignment
requirements
Does not meet the
requirements of the
assignment.
Critical Thinking
(15%)
Professional insights
into depth and breadth
of assignment – goes
WELL beyond
assignment
requirements to
explore risks and/or
relevant new
techniques.
Comprehensive
explanation of the
issue; exploration of
expert viewpoints and
use of evidence to
inform interpretation
and analysis; thorough
evaluation of the
context (historical,
ethical, cultural,
environmental or
circumstantial
settings), and self and
others’ assumptions
and perspectives when
stating a position; wellinformed conclusions
based on methodically
prioritized evidence
and perspectives.
Includes an explanation
of the issue;
exploration of expert
viewpoints and use of
evidence to inform
interpretation and
analysis; includes an
evaluation of the
context (historical,
ethical, cultural,
environmental or
circumstantial
settings), and self and
others’ assumptions
and perspectives when
stating a position;
conclusions are based
on methodically
prioritized evidence
and perspectives.
Includes a general
explanation of the issue
but is vague or is not
clearly linked to the
identified risks;
includes some
exploration of expert
viewpoints and use of
evidence to inform
interpretation and
analysis; includes a
general evaluation of
the context (historical,
ethical, cultural,
environmental or
circumstantial
settings), and self and
others’ assumptions
and perspectives when
stating a position, but
Does not explain the
issue; does not explore
expert viewpoints or
use evidence to inform
interpretation and
analysis; does not
provide an evaluation
of the context
(historical, ethical,
cultural, environmental
or circumstantial
settings), and self and
others’ assumptions
and perspectives when
stating a position;
conclusions are not
based on prioritized
evidence and
perspectives.
lack specificity;
conclusions are based
on prioritized evidence
and perspectives.
Communication
(10%) (includes
grammar and
clarity)
Goes well beyond
assignment
requirements to
communicate
information in a
precise, insightful and
professional manner.
Assignment is well
organized, and the
format can be followed.
It is evident to reader
what is contained in
each section of the
report. High quality
grammar. No
misspellings.
Assignment is
organized, and the
format can be followed.
It is evident to reader
what is contained in
each section of the
report. High quality
grammar. No
misspellings.
Assignment is well
organized, and the
format can be followed.
It is evident to reader
what is contained in
each section of the
report. Good quality
grammar. Minor
misspellings.
Assignment is not
organized. It is not
evident to reader what
is contained in each
section of report. Low
quality grammar,
misspellings.
Formatting
(5%)
Virtually no errors in
formatting, citations,
or references.
Rare errors in
formatting, citations,
or references.
Some errors in
formatting, citations,
or references.
Multiple errors in
formatting, citations,
or references.
Does not submit
assignment materials
in APA 6 format.
NOTE: Gross
failure to
provide
PROPER
citations and
references –
particularly
with regard to
direct quotes –
will result in
sanctions as
outlined in the
academic
honesty policy
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
