I already have an outline for this paper. I’ve attached it here.
For this assignment, you will complete the following sections:
Introduction (Links to an external site.)
: Introduce the
thesis Â (Links to an external site.)
and provide a brief overview of the main points.
Explain why and how three environmental challenges/problems are associated with this issue.
Explain why and how direct and/or indirect environmental values are impacted by this issue.
Recommend a policy that will effectively and efficiently address the three environmental challenges/problems associated with your issue.
Evaluate the social, political, economic, and environmental pros/cons of implementing your policy.
Conclusion (Links to an external site.)
: Conclude your paper with a brief review your main points and overall argument/thesis.
Important: Parts 2 to 5 need be written as body paragraphs, with all of the parts necessary for a complete body
paragraph (Links to an external site.)
The paper must be 10 to 12 pages in length (excluding title and reference pages) and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the
Writing Center (Links to an external site.)
. You must use at least four credible
(at least two of which must be found in the University of Arizona Global Campus Library) other than the textbook to support your claims. Cite your sources
in-text (Links to an external site.)
and on the
reference page (Links to an external site.)
. For additional information regarding APA samples and tutorials, visit the Writing Center, located within the Learning Resources tab on the left navigation toolbar, in your online course.
Writing the Final Paper
The Final Paper:
Must be 10 to 12 double-spaced pages in length (excluding title and reference pages), and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Writing Center.
Outline – Loss of Biodiversity
Outline – Loss of Biodiversity
Introduction and thesis
A. Introduction: The planet’s biodiversity is collapsing. U.S. richness of species and
ecosystems is declining at a higher rate. Biodiversity loss is a serious threat to humanity.
B. Thesis: No Net Loss policies will help to restore the planetâ€™s richness of species, and
ecosystems of yesteryears so as to protect humans from destroyed humanityâ€™s food
supply, health risks, and dangers to human habitat.
A. Humanity’s food supply is disrupted by biodiversity loss because the ecosystems donâ€™t
function normally as they have been doing.
Supporting evidence: â€œIf, however, the relationship between biodiversity and ecosystem
functioning is monotonically increasing, as Reich et al.â€™s reanalyses suggest, then each
extinction would produce an incremental decrease in the functioning of ecosystemsâ€
1. Explanation: The quote implies that humans get food when the ecosystems are
2. So what? Biodiversity loss interferes with the functioning of ecosystems and this
interference leads to the loss of food sources for humans.
B. Biodiversity loss has devastating health consequences for humans.
Supporting evidence: â€œBiodiversity hypothesis states that contact with natural
environments enriches the human microbiome, promotes immune balance and protects
from allergy and inflammatory disordersâ€ (Haahtela, 2019).
1. Explanation: The quote shows that the healthy living of humans is dependent on nature.
2. So what?: With biodiversity lost, human immunity is lower. Humans become vulnerable
to many diseases.
C. Humans rely on ecosystems for survival and they will therefore lose quality habitat once
the biodiversity completely collapses
Supporting evidence: â€œPeople who rely most directly on ecosystem services, such as
subsistence farmers, the rural poor, and traditional societies, face the most serious and
immediate risks from biodiversity lossâ€ (Cardinale, 2012).
1. Explanation: The quote demonstrates that humans obtain many benefits from the
biodiversity that enhances their survival.
2. So what? Once biodiversity is lost, a human loses all these benefits, and this leads to
Direct/indirect environmental values
A. The human food, health, and security needs will not be adequately met once the species
richness is lost.
Supporting evidence: â€œBiodiversity supports human and societal needs, including food
and nutrition security, energy, development of medicines and pharmaceuticals and
freshwater, which together underpin good healthâ€ (WHO, 2015).
1. Explanation: Biodiversity is the source of all these needs, and once it has been lost, a
human cannot meet their needs sufficiently anymore.
2. So what?: The overall well-being of humans will reduce since it directly depends on
A. NNL policy will effectively address the biodiversity loss
Supporting evidence: â€œBiodiversity offsets are considered typically to seek to achieve
NNL either through active ecosystem restoration or through the prevention of anticipated
biodiversity losses (avoided loss offsets), both of which result in biodiversity gains
depending upon the reference scenarioâ€ (Bull & Srange, 2018).
1. Explanation: The evidence shows that No Net Loss policies will mitigate the
2. So what?: NNL policy will lead to biodiversity conservation.
A. The outcomes of the biodiversity policy are predictable but the restoration outcomes have
Supporting evidence: â€œA fundamental problem in offsetting is the often poor definition
and measurability of the value(s) to be offsetâ€ (Maron et al., 2012).
1. Explanation: The evidence implies that the policy benefits cannot be estimated when
they will materialize.
2. So what?: The short-term effectiveness of the policy cannot be easily determined.
B. The policy is easier to implement although its implementation relies on the goodwill of
political leaders who may at times have no interest in biodiversity protection.
Supporting evidence: â€œBiodiversity protection interests usually have no vested interest in
biodiversity barterâ€ (Maron et al., 2012).
1. Explanation: The evidence demonstrates that the implementation of biodiversity policy
is not assured.
2. So what?: A leader who doesn’t have a biodiversity interest will not prioritize
implementing the policy
C. The policy has a significant value but the value cannot commoditize.
Supporting evidence: â€œThe major difficulty in evaluating avoidance is that only part of
the process of avoidance is observable: permit denials and evaluations of alternative
impact sites common to major infrastructure projectâ€ (Ermgassen, 2019)
1. Explanation: The source demonstrates how hard it is to quantify the biodiversity
2. So what?: The cost-benefit-analysis cannot be easily done
D. The policy repairs the damaged ecosystems but it is slow in restoring the benefits lost as a
result of biodiversity loss.
Supporting evidence: â€œRestoration activities have become a major part of ongoing
efforts to better manage ecosystems and repair damage caused by past mismanagement
and degradationâ€ (Ermgassen, 2019)
1. Explanation: The source implies that repairing the ecosystem is beneficial to humans but
the pace at which the biodiversity benefits are restored is slow.
2. So what?: It may take a long time for humans to fully benefit from the policy.
A. Rephrased Thesis: Biodiversity loss can be addressed using No Net Loss biodiversity
policies and this will restore the benefits that humans forego when the loss happens.
B. Strong Closing: Humanity is greatly endangered if biodiversity loss is not addressed
Bull, J., & Srange, N. (2018). The global extent of biodiversity offset implementation under no
net loss policies. Kent Academic Repository.
Cardinale, B. (2012). Impacts of Biodiversity Loss. Science, 336, 552-3.
Haahtela, T. (2019). A biodiversity hypothesis. Allergy, 74(8), 1445-1456.
Maron, Hobbs, R. J., Moilanen, A., Matthews, J. W., Christie, K., Gardner, T. A., Keith, D. A.,
Lindenmayer, D. B., & McAlpine, C. A. (2012). Faustian bargains? Restoration realities
in the context of biodiversity offset policies. Biological Conservation, 155, 141â€“148.
WHO. (2015, 3 June 3). Biodiversity and Health. https://www.who.int/news-room/factsheets/detail/biodiversity-and-health
zu Ermgassen, Baker, J., Griffiths, R. A., Strange, N., Struebig, M. J., & Bull, J. W. (2019). The
ecological outcomes of biodiversity offsets under â€œno net lossâ€ policies: A global review.
Conservation Letters, 12(6). https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12664
Purchase answer to see full