+1(978)310-4246 credencewriters@gmail.com
  

Description

In an effort to assist you with your final project and the importance of having trauma informed agencies in the communities, please reflect on a time you or someone you know of experienced a type of traumatic event. What resources were available to you at that time? What resources would have been helpful? Were you or your friend/family member knowledgeable about all community resources prior to the incident? Were there any real/perceived barriers to accessing these facilities? Were you previously familiar with these resources, why or why not? If you were familiar with the resources, please provide information regarding the agency such as mission statement, preferred treatment modalities (if available), etc. you may utilize the NCTSN website for assistance or google. While creating this journal, please also document any/all emotions that you experienced. Also, now that you have started your Community Agency Proposal Project, be sure to record any similarities that you encountered and if you now have a better understanding of the way the organization was operating.

Criteria
Ratings
Pts
20 to >19 pts
Distinguished
19 to >17 pts
Proficient
17 to >15 pts
Satisfactory
15 to >13 pts
Emerging
13 to >O pts
Unsatisfactory
Organization
/ 20 pts
view longer description
Information is
very organized
with well
constructed
paragraphs, use
of subheadings,
and information
is factual and
correct.
Information is
organized with
well constructed
delivery
depending on
project medium
and information
is factual and
correct.
Information is
organized but
project is not
well constructed
and information
is factual.
The information
appears
disorganized
information is
suspect to being
correct and
factual.
Information is
not only
disorganized but
inaccurate.
20 to >19 pts
Distinguished
19 to >17 pts
Proficient
17 to >15 pts
Satisfactory
15 to >13 pts
Emerging
13 to >0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Description/Explanation
/ 20 pts
view longer description
Description/expl
anation of
event/experienc
e was very
detailed.
Specifics and
examples were
used and the
reader could
clearly envision
what happened.
Description of
event/experienc
e was good.
Examples were
given but some
details were not
specific
Description/expl
anation of
event/experienc
e was given.
Some
details/examples
were included.
Description/expl
anation of
event/experienc
e was lacking.
Details/examples
were not
included.
The
description/expla
nation of the
event/experienc
e was not
present.
20 to >19 pts
Distinguished
19 to >17 pts
Proficient
17 to >15 pts
Satisfactory
15 to >13 pts
Emerging
13 to >O pts
Unsatisfactory
Connections
| 20 pts
view longer description
Connections
were made to
real life
situations and/or
theories and
concepts from
the text. All
connections
were
appropriate,
accurate,
creative, and
insightful.
Connections
were made to
real life
situations and/or
theories and
concepts from
the text. All
connections
were appropriate
and accurate.
Connections
were made to
real life
situations and/or
theories and
concepts from
the text. Most
connections
were appropriate
and accurate.
Connections to
real life
situations and/or
theories and
concepts were
lacking. When
made, they were
superficial
and/or
inappropriate
and inaccurate.
Connections
were not made.
19 to >17 pts
Proficient
17 to >15 pts
Satisfactory
13 to >0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Reflective Writing
20 to >19 pts
Distinguished
Author provided
much reflection.
Information
clearly relates to
the main topic. It
includes several
supporting
details and/or
examples.
/ 20 pts
15 to >13 pts
Emerging
Reflection was
lacking.
Information has
little to do with
the main topic.
Reflection was
included.
Information
clearly relates to
the main topic. It
provides 1 – 2
supporting
details and/or
examples
view longer description
Some reflective
writing was
evident.
Information
clearly relates to
the main topic.
No details and/or
examples or
given.
Reflection was
absent.
Information has
nothing to do
with the main
topic.
10 to >9 pts
Distinguished
7 to >6 pts
Emerging
9 to >8 pts
Proficient
8 to >7 pts
Satisfactory
6 to >0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Analysis/Evaluation
/ 10 pts
view longer description
The
sophisticated
and detailed
analysis/evaluati
on of the
material was
given. The
information was
broken down
accurately
and/or accurate
judgements were
made.
A sufficient
analysis/evaluati
on of the
material was
given. The
information was
broken down
accurately
and/or accurate
judgements were
made.
An
analysis/evaluati
on of the
material was
given. Some of
the information
was broken
down accurately
and/or accurate
judgements were
made.
An
analysis/evaluati
on of the
material was
lacking. Most of
the information
was broken
down
inaccurately
and/or
inaccurate
judgements were
made.
An
analysis/evaluati
on of the
material was
lacking.
9 to >8 pts
Proficient
10 to >9 pts
Distinguished
8 to >7 pts
Satisfactory
6 to >0 pts
Unsatisfactory
7 to >6 pts
Emerging
Grammatical
Mechanics
errors were
/ 10 pts
view longer description
Almost no
grammatical,
spelling, or
punctuation
No grammatical,
spelling or
punctuation
errors.
A few
grammatical,
spelling, or
punctuation
Many
grammatical,
spelling, or
punctuation
numerous and
interfered with
the content of
the work.
errors.
errors.
errors.

Purchase answer to see full
attachment

  
error: Content is protected !!