+1(978)310-4246 credencewriters@gmail.com
  

In this final week of your internship, your rotation assignment takes you back to the Chief of Staff’s Office where you started out seven weeks ago.

Among other things, the Chief of Staff’s organization is responsible for organizing meetings and providing support to the various internal governance boards and executive committees that comprise the internal governance infrastructure. Last week, you had a brief introduction to the work of one of these boards — the IT Governance board — when you helped the Chief Financial Officer and CFO staff put together a briefing to inform the board’s members about a technology problem.

The work of the company’s governance boards and committees is extremely important since these groups plan, design, negotiate, implement and provide oversight for the processes, policies, procedures, and other mechanisms used to guide,  monitor, control, and assess the operations of the company. Each board is comprised of executives who each represent their functional areas or a group of internal stakeholders. Usually, there is a chair position that rotates among the members. If you would like to learn more about corporate governance in general, Deloitte’s report

Developing an effective governance operating model: A guide for financial services boards and management teams

provides a brief but comprehensive overview (see

https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/global/Documents/Financial-Services/dttl-fsi-US-FSI-Developinganeffectivegovernance-031913.pdf

). You may also find this article

What is a management system?

, from the International Standards Organization, helpful as it explains what a

management system

is and why standards are needed to define repeatable steps that organizations can use to ensure the effectiveness and efficiency of their management activities.

The IT Governance board operates under authority delegated by the corporate governance board. This board’s charter gives it responsibility for governance, risk management, and compliance management (GRC) for corporate IT processes, policies, and technologies. Members of the board each serve for a three year term. Of the 24 members, 8 have just begun their terms.

The IT Governance board focuses upon ensuring that the company achieves maximum value for each dollar spent on information technology capabilities. The board’s members must exercise

due diligence

to ensure that the company complies with laws and regulations that apply to the use of Information Technology (including privacy and security requirements). The board is also charged with ensuring that the company complies with voluntary standards such as PCI-DSS since these have an impact on the company’s business operations (non compliance could result in the company not being permitted to receive payments via credit cards).

The next meeting of the IT Governance board will include a set of orientation briefings for the new members. Your assignment, as a support staffer, is to help prepare for this orientation meeting by developing a short (5-minute) briefing on one of the following IT management / IT security management frameworks, standards, and models.

COBIT

ITIL

ISO 27001 (ISMS Program Management)

NIST Cybersecurity Framework

NIST Security and Privacy Controls (NIST SP 800-53)

NIST Risk Management Framework (NIST SP 800-37)

7/7/22, 1:20 PM
Rubric Assessment – CSIA 300 6384 Cybersecurity for Leaders and Managers (2225) – UMGC Learning Management System
50/50 Discussion Participation with Critiques and
Follow-ups
Course: CSIA 300 6384 Cybersecurity for Leaders and Managers (2225)
Timeliness of
Initial Posting
Timeliness of
Response to
Discussion
Paper
Assignment
On Time
Late
Very Late
No Submission
Criterion Score
5 points
4 points
3 points
0 points
/5
Posted
response to
topic
assignment
before 11:59
PM ET on
Sunday.
Posted
response to
topic
assignment
before 11:59
PM ET on
Monday.
Posted
response to
topic
assignment
before 11:59
PM ET on
Tuesday.
Did not post
response to
topic
assignment
before 11:59
PM ET on
Tuesday.
“Short
Paper”
(Response
Excellent
to Topic
Assignme
nt)
Outstanding Acceptable
Needs
Needs
Missing or
Significant
Improvemen
No Work
Improvemen
t
Submitted
t
Criterion
Score
https://learn.umgc.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=759868&evalObjectId=3855606&evalObjectType=5&userId=…
1/11
7/7/22, 1:20 PM
“Short
Paper”
(Response
to Topic
Assignme
nt)
Introduct
ion
Rubric Assessment – CSIA 300 6384 Cybersecurity for Leaders and Managers (2225) – UMGC Learning Management System
Excellent
Outstanding Acceptable
Needs
Needs
Missing or
Significant
Improvemen
No Work
Improvemen
t
Submitted
t
7.5 points
6.5 points
5.5 points
4.5 points
2 points
Provided
Provided
Provided
Provided
Attempted Introductio
an
excellent
introductio
n to the
deliverable
which
clearly,
concisely,
and
accurately
addressed
the topic
of the
short
paper.
Appropriat
an
outstandin
g
introductio
n to the
deliverable
which
clearly and
accurately
addressed
the topic
of the
short
paper.
Appropriat
ely
an
acceptable
introductio
n to the
deliverable
which
addressed
the topic
of the
short
paper.
Appropriat
ely
paraphrase
d
informatio
an
introductio
n to the
deliverable
but the
section
lacked
some
required
details.
Informatio
n from
authoritati
ve sources
was
mentioned.
to provide
an
introductio
n to the
deliverable
but this
section
lacked
detail
and/or was
not well
supported
by
informatio
n drawn
from
ely
paraphrase
d
informatio
n from
authoritati
ve sources.
paraphrase n from
d
authoritati
informatio ve sources.
n from
authoritati
ve sources.
0 points
Criterion
Score
/ 7.5
n was
missing or
no work
submitted.
authoritati
ve sources
(too many
quotations
or
improper
paraphrasi
ng).
https://learn.umgc.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=759868&evalObjectId=3855606&evalObjectType=5&userId=…
2/11
7/7/22, 1:20 PM
Rubric Assessment – CSIA 300 6384 Cybersecurity for Leaders and Managers (2225) – UMGC Learning Management System
“Short
Paper”
(Response
Excellent
to Topic
Assignme
Outstanding Acceptable
Needs
Needs
Missing or
Significant
Improvemen
No Work
Improvemen
t
Submitted
t
Criterion
Score
nt)
Analysis
17.5 points 15.5 points 14.5 points 12.5 points 6.5 points
0 points
Provided
an
excellent
analysis of
the issues
for the
required
topic.
Addressed
at least
three
separate
issues and
Provided
an
outstandin
g analysis
of the
issues for
the
required
topic.
Addressed
at least
two
separate
Provided
an
acceptable
analysis of
the issues
for the
required
topic.
Addressed
at least
one
specific
issue and
Addressed
the
required
topic but
the
analysis
lacked
details or
was
somewhat
disorganize
d.
Appropriat
Mentioned Analysis
the
was
required
missing or
topic but
no work
the
was
analysis
submitted.
was very
disorganize
d or off
topic. OR,
the
analysis did
not
provided
appropriat
e examples
for each.
Appropriat
ely used
and cited
informatio
n from
authoritati
ve sources.
issues and
provided
appropriat
e examples
for each.
Appropriat
ely used
and cited
informatio
n from
authoritati
ve sources.
provided
an
appropriat
e example.
Appropriat
ely used
and cited
informatio
n from
authoritati
ve sources.
ely used
and cited
informatio
n from
authoritati
ve sources.
appropriat
ely use
informatio
n from
authoritati
ve sources
(too many
quotations
or
improper
paraphrasi
ng).
/ 17.5
https://learn.umgc.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=759868&evalObjectId=3855606&evalObjectType=5&userId=…
3/11
7/7/22, 1:20 PM
Rubric Assessment – CSIA 300 6384 Cybersecurity for Leaders and Managers (2225) – UMGC Learning Management System
“Short
Paper”
(Response
to Topic
Assignme
Excellent
Outstanding Acceptable
Needs
Needs
Missing or
Significant
Improvemen
No Work
Improvemen
t
Submitted
t
10 points
9 points
8 points
5 points
1 point
0 points
Included
an
excellent
Included
an
outstandin
Included a
summary
paragraph
Included a
summary
paragraph
Included a
few
summary
Did not
include a
summary
summary
section for
g summary for the
paragraph short
but, this
section
sentences
for the
for the
short
the short
paper
which was
on topic,
for the
short
paper
which was
paper
which was
on topic
and
lacked
short
content or paper.
was
disorganize
well
organized,
and
covered at
on topic
and
covered at
least 3 key
provided
an
appropriat
e closing.
d.
Criterion
Score
/ 10
nt)
Summary
paper.
least 3 key points.
points. The
summary
contained
at least
one full
paragraph.
https://learn.umgc.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=759868&evalObjectId=3855606&evalObjectType=5&userId=…
4/11
7/7/22, 1:20 PM
Rubric Assessment – CSIA 300 6384 Cybersecurity for Leaders and Managers (2225) – UMGC Learning Management System
“Short
Paper”
(Response
to Topic
Excellent
Outstanding Acceptable
Needs
Needs
Missing or
Significant
Improvemen
No Work
Improvemen
t
Submitted
t
5 points
4 points
3 points
2 points
1 point
Included
Included
Included
Included
Mentioned References
and
properly
cited three
or more
and
properly
cited three
or more
and cited
two or
more
authoritati
and cited
at least
one
authoritati
at least
one
authoritati
ve source
and
citations
were
missing.
authoritati
ve sources
with
complete
authoritati
ve sources
(minor
errors
ve sources
(minor
errors in
citations or
ve source
(minor
errors in
citations or
but, the
citations
and/or
reference
Or, no
work
submitted.
publication allowable).
or retrieval Reference
reference
entries).
reference
entries).
list entries
lacked
informatio
n. No
formatting
errors.
list entries
contain
sufficient
informatio
Reference
list entries
contain
sufficient
Reference
list entries
contain
sufficient
required
informatio
n (not
sufficient
n to enable
the reader
to find and
retrieve
informatio
n to enable
the reader
to find and
informatio to retrieve
n to enable the correct
the reader resource).
to find and
the cited
sources.
retrieve
the cited
retrieve
the cited
sources.
sources.
Assignme
nt)
Use of
Authorita
tive
Sources
0 points
Criterion
Score
/5
https://learn.umgc.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=759868&evalObjectId=3855606&evalObjectType=5&userId=…
5/11
7/7/22, 1:20 PM
Rubric Assessment – CSIA 300 6384 Cybersecurity for Leaders and Managers (2225) – UMGC Learning Management System
“Short
Paper”
Outstanding Acceptable
Needs
Needs
Missing or
Significant
Improvemen
No Work
Improvemen
t
Submitted
t
Criterion
Score
5 points
4 points
3 points
2 points
1 point
0 points
/5
No
Work
Errors in
Submitted
Submitted
No
formatting,
grammar,
spelling, or
punctuatio
contains
minor
errors in
formatting,
formatting,
spelling,
grammar,
or
work has
numerous
errors in
formatting,
work is
difficult to
read
and/or
submission
.
n errors.
Submitted
grammar,
spelling or
punctuatio spelling,
n which
grammar,
understand
. OR, work
work
shows
outstandin
g
punctuatio
n which do
not
significantl
need
attention /
editing to
improve
or
punctuatio
n.
Substantial
has
significant
errors in
formatting,
organizatio
n and the
use of
color,
y impact
profession
al
appearanc
profession
al
appearanc
e of the
polishing /
editing is
required.
spelling,
grammar,
punctuatio
n, or word
fonts,
titles,
headings
and sub-
e. Work
needs
some
polishing
work.
headings,
etc. is
appropriat
e to the
assignment
type.
to improve
profession
al
appearanc
e.
(Response
Excellent
to Topic
Assignme
nt)
Professio
nalism
First Critique
Excellent
Acceptable
usage
which
detract
from the
overall
profession
al
appearanc
e of the
work.
Needs
Significant
Improvement
Missing or No
Work Submitted
Criterion Score
https://learn.umgc.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=759868&evalObjectId=3855606&evalObjectType=5&userId=…
6/11
7/7/22, 1:20 PM
First Critique
Analysis
Rubric Assessment – CSIA 300 6384 Cybersecurity for Leaders and Managers (2225) – UMGC Learning Management System
Excellent
Acceptable
Needs
Significant
Improvement
Missing or No
Work Submitted
Criterion Score
10 points
8.5 points
6 points
0 points
/ 10
The critique
posting
provided three
The critique
posting
provided at
The posting
The analysis
did not provide was missing (or
a critique of
not submitted
or more
suggestions for
improvement
in content
which were
based upon an
least three
suggestions for
improvement
in content
which were
based upon an
the short
paper. The
posting may
have included
compliments
or “good job”
before 11:59
PM ET
Tuesday night).
OR the
submitted
critique was
analysis of the
short paper
(how well it
met the
content
requirements).
analysis of the
short paper
(how well it
met the
content
requirements).
type
comments.
copied (not the
student’s own
original work).
Provided
examples
which could be
incorporated
into the short
paper to
Authoritative
sources were
cited as
appropriate.
The posting
addressed the
improve or
refine it.
Authoritative
sources were
cited as
appropriate.
The posting
addressed the
peer author by
name.
peer author by
name.
https://learn.umgc.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=759868&evalObjectId=3855606&evalObjectType=5&userId=…
7/11
7/7/22, 1:20 PM
First Critique
Professionali
sm
Second
Critique
Rubric Assessment – CSIA 300 6384 Cybersecurity for Leaders and Managers (2225) – UMGC Learning Management System
Excellent
Acceptable
Needs
Significant
Improvement
Missing or No
Work Submitted
Criterion Score
5 points
4 points
3 points
0 points
/5
The critique
was written in
an appropriate
tone of voice
for a peer-to-
The critique
was written in
an appropriate
tone of voice
for a peer-to-
The tone of
voice used in
the critique
was not
appropriate for
No submission
(or not
submitted
before 11:59
PM ET
peer
communication
. No
formatting,
grammar,
spelling, or
peer
communication
. Authoritative
sources were
appropriately
cited. Work
a peer-to-peer
communication
in the
workplace. OR,
there were
errors in
Tuesday
night). Or, the
critique was
copied (not the
student’s own
original work).
punctuation
errors.
Authoritative
sources were
appropriately
cited.
contains minor
errors in
formatting,
grammar,
spelling or
punctuation
formatting,
spelling,
grammar, or
punctuation
which need
attention /
Submitted
work shows
outstanding
organization
and the use of
color, fonts,
titles, headings
and sub-
which do not
significantly
impact
professional
appearance.
Work needs
some polishing
to improve
editing to
improve
professional
appearance of
the work.
headings, etc.
is appropriate
to the
assignment
type.
professional
appearance.
Excellent
Acceptable
Needs
Significant
Improvement
Missing or No
Work Submitted
Criterion Score
https://learn.umgc.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=759868&evalObjectId=3855606&evalObjectType=5&userId=…
8/11
7/7/22, 1:20 PM
Second
Critique
Analysis
Rubric Assessment – CSIA 300 6384 Cybersecurity for Leaders and Managers (2225) – UMGC Learning Management System
Excellent
Acceptable
Needs
Significant
Improvement
Missing or No
Work Submitted
Criterion Score
10 points
8.5 points
6 points
0 points
/ 10
The critique
The critique
The posting
The analysis
posting
provided three
or more
suggestions for
improvement
in content
posting
provided at
least three
suggestions for
improvement
in content
did not provide
a critique of
the short
paper. The
posting may
have included
was missing (or
not submitted
before 11:59
PM ET
Tuesday night).
OR the
which were
based upon an
analysis of the
short paper
(how well it
met the
which were
based upon an
analysis of the
short paper
(how well it
met the
compliments
or “good job”
type
comments.
submitted
critique was
copied (not the
student’s own
original work).
content
requirements).
Provided
examples
which could be
incorporated
into the short
paper to
content
requirements).
Authoritative
sources were
cited as
appropriate.
The posting
addressed the
improve or
refine it.
Authoritative
sources were
cited as
appropriate.
peer author by
name.
The posting
addressed the
peer author by
name.
https://learn.umgc.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=759868&evalObjectId=3855606&evalObjectType=5&userId=…
9/11
7/7/22, 1:20 PM
Second
Critique
Professionali
sm
Rubric Assessment – CSIA 300 6384 Cybersecurity for Leaders and Managers (2225) – UMGC Learning Management System
Excellent
Acceptable
Needs
Significant
Improvement
Missing or No
Work Submitted
Criterion Score
5 points
4 points
3 points
0 points
/5
The critique
was written in
an appropriate
The critique
was written in
an appropriate
The tone of
voice used in
the critique
No submission
(or not
submitted
tone of voice
for a peer-topeer
communication
. No
formatting,
tone of voice
for a peer-topeer
communication
. Authoritative
sources were
was not
appropriate for
a peer-to-peer
communication
in the
workplace. OR,
before 11:59
PM ET
Tuesday
night). Or, the
critique was
copied (not the
grammar,
spelling, or
punctuation
errors.
Authoritative
sources were
appropriately
cited.
appropriately
cited. Work
contains minor
errors in
formatting,
grammar,
spelling or
punctuation
there were
errors in
formatting,
spelling,
grammar, or
punctuation
which need
attention /
student’s own
original work).
Submitted
work shows
outstanding
organization
and the use of
color, fonts,
which do not
significantly
impact
professional
appearance.
Work needs
editing to
improve
professional
appearance of
the work.
titles, headings
and subheadings, etc.
is appropriate
to the
assignment
some polishing
to improve
professional
appearance.
type.
Contributions
to Discussion
Excellent
Acceptable
Needs
Improvement
Missing or No
Work Submitted
Criterion Score
https://learn.umgc.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=759868&evalObjectId=3855606&evalObjectType=5&userId…
10/11
7/7/22, 1:20 PM
Contributions
to Discussion
Follow-up
Reply or
Comment #1
Rubric Assessment – CSIA 300 6384 Cybersecurity for Leaders and Managers (2225) – UMGC Learning Management System
Excellent
Acceptable
Needs
Improvement
10 points
8.5 points
6 points
Missing or No
Work Submitted
Criterion Score
Posted a
Posted an
Posted a
follow-up reply acceptable
follow-up reply
or comment
follow-up reply or comment
which
demonstrated
critical thinking
and added
value to the
discussion.
or comment
which added
some value to
the discussion.
but added little
value to the
discussion.
Follow-up
Reply or
Comment #2
Total
/ 100
Overall Score
Do Not Use This Box
0 points minimum
https://learn.umgc.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=759868&evalObjectId=3855606&evalObjectType=5&userId…
11/11

Purchase answer to see full
attachment

  
error: Content is protected !!