+1(978)310-4246 credencewriters@gmail.com
  

Cross-Management Portfolio
by Karima Zerouak Chavez
Submission date: 29-Nov-2021 12:45PM (UTC+0000)
Submission ID: 164260974
File name: Cross-Management_Portfolio_Karima.docx (57.95K)
Word count: 5654
Character count: 31015
Cross-Management Portfolio
GRADEMARK REPORT
FINAL GRADE
71
GENERAL COMMENTS
Instructor
Dear student,
Thank you for your submission.
The discussion in this report is to some extent
relevant to the questions in the assignment brief.
/100
The writing style is clear and easy to read.
10 marks deducted for exceeding the word limit.
Presented Executive Summary that articulates the
key features of the submission including
recommendations with rationale. Overall good
referencing.
Proficient reflection on company culture and very
good information on teamwork is provided.
Proficient reflection on conflicts and cultural
differences among team members and how these
have been solved
Proficient reflection on own leadership experience
throughout the term.
Proficient reflection on Belbin roles that have been
observed in the team.
Proficient use and application of theories, models
or frameworks within the report.
Very good critical evaluation, application and
synthesis of information.
Strong evidence of research was gathered from a
wide range of sources. Research and analysis are
consistent and fed into the report.
The English, including style and spelling, is clear
and understandable. There are still some
distracting spelling and grammatical mistakes.
Limited use of business English language.
Appropriate referencing, citation, and
acknowledgement of sources using the Coventry
University APA reference style.
PAGE 1
PAGE 2
PAGE 3
PAGE 4
PAGE 5
PAGE 6
PAGE 7
PAGE 8
PAGE 9
PAGE 10
PAGE 11
PAGE 12
PAGE 13
PAGE 14
PAGE 15
PAGE 16
PAGE 17
PAGE 18
PAGE 19
RUBRIC: 118LON CW2 REPORT RUBRIC
7.10 / 10
CRITERION 1 (10%)
5 / 10
SCALE 1
(0)
No executive summary
SCALE 2
(2)
Weak Executive Summary or poor information provided.
SCALE 3
(3)
Inadequete Executive Summary with vague and unclear information that does not
set the set the submission in context.
SCALE 4
(4)
Basic attempt at an Executive Summary. May be more an Introduction than a
summary. No inclusion of recommendations. No in-text referencing.
SCALE 5
(5)
A reasonable Executive Summary is provided. Some aspects of the key features of
the submission may be missing. Referencing is undertaken but not complete and
the context of the assignment may not be clear.
SCALE 6
(6)
A competent Executive Summary is presented which highlights most of the key
features of the submission. Effective recommendations are provided but these are
descriptive in places. Good referencing. Sets the submission in context.
SCALE 7
(7)
Overall very good and well-presented Executive Summary that articulates the key
features of the submission including recommendations with rationale. Overall
good referencing. Sets the submission in context.
SCALE 8
(8)
Articulated and well-presented Executive Summary that clearly articulates the key
features of the submission including recommendations with rationale. Fully
referenced. Sets the submission firmly in context.
SCALE 9
(9)
Outstanding Executive Summary that clearly articulates the key features of the
submission including recommendations with rationale. Fully referenced.Sets the
submission firmly in context.
SCALE 10
(10)
Flaultless Executive Summary that clearly articulates the key features of the
submission including recommendations with rationale. Fully referenced.Sets the
submission firmly in context.
CRITERION 2 (10%)
7 / 10
SCALE 1
(0)
No reflection on own role working in a global diverse team or poor information
provided.
SCALE 2
(2)
Unsatisfactory eflection on own role working in a global diverse team or poor
information provided.
SCALE 3
(3)
Limited ability to reflect on own role working in a global diverse team or
incomplete and vague information provided.
SCALE 4
(4)
Demonstartes basicability to reflect on own role working in a global diverse team
and basic information on team work is provided.
SCALE 5
(5)
Demonstrtes a fair ability to reflect on own role working in a global diverse team
and appropriate information on teamwork is provided.
SCALE 6
(6)
Demonstartes a competent ability to reflect on own role working in a global diverse
team and good information on team work is provided.
SCALE 7
(7)
Proficient reflection on own role working in a global diverse team and very good
information on team work is provided
SCALE 8
(8)
Excellent reflection on own role working in a global diverse team and excellent
information on team work is provided
SCALE 9
(9)
Outstanding reflection on own role working in a global diverse team and
impeccable information on team work is provided
SCALE 10
(10)
Faultless reflection on own role working in a global diverse team and exceptional
information on team work is provided
CRITERION 3 (10%)
7 / 10
SCALE 1
(0)
No reflection on conflicts and cultural differences among team members and how
these have been solved
SCALE 2
(2)
Unsatisfactory reflection on conflicts and cultural differences among team
members and how these have been solved
SCALE 3
(3)
Limited ability to reflect on conflicts and cultural differences among team
members and how these have been solved
SCALE 4
(4)
Demonstartes basic ability to reflect conflicts and cultural differences among team
members and how these have been solved
SCALE 5
(5)
Demonstrtes a fair ability to reflect on conflicts and cultural differences among
team members and how these have been solved
SCALE 6
(6)
Demonstartes a competent ability to reflect on conflicts and cultural differences
among team members and how these have been solved
SCALE 7
(7)
Proficient reflection on conflicts and cultural differences among team members
and how these have been solved
SCALE 8
(8)
Excellent reflection on conflicts and cultural differences among team members
and how these have been solved
SCALE 9
(9)
Outstanding reflection on conflicts and cultural differences among team members
and how these have been solved
SCALE 10
(10)
Faultless reflection on conflicts and cultural differences among team members
and how these have been solved
CRITERION 4 (10%)
SCALE 1
7 / 10
No reflection on own leadership experience throughtout the term
(0)
SCALE 2
(2)
Unsatisfactory reflection on own leadership experience throughtout the term
SCALE 3
(3)
Limited ability to reflect on own leadership experience throughtout the term
SCALE 4
(4)
Demonstartes basic ability to reflect on own leadership experience throughtout
the term
SCALE 5
(5)
Demonstrtes a fair ability to reflect on own leadership experience throughtout the
term
SCALE 6
(6)
Demonstartes a competent ability to reflect on own leadership experience
throughtout the term
SCALE 7
(7)
Proficient reflection on own leadership experience throughtout the term
SCALE 8
(8)
Excellent reflection on own leadership experience throughtout the term
SCALE 9
(9)
Outstanding reflection on own leadership experience throughtout the term
SCALE 10
(10)
Faultless reflection on own leadership experience throughtout the term
CRITERION 5 (10%)
7 / 10
SCALE 1
(0)
No reflection on Belbin roles that have been observed in the team
SCALE 2
(2)
Unsatisfactory reflection on Belbin roles that have been observed in the team
SCALE 3
(3)
Limited ability to reflect on Belbin roles that have been observed in the team
SCALE 4
(4)
Demonstartes basic ability to reflect on Belbin roles that have been observed in
the team
SCALE 5
(5)
Demonstrtes a fair ability to reflect on Belbin roles that have been observed in the
team
SCALE 6
(6)
Demonstartes a competent ability to reflect on Belbin roles that have been
observed in the team
SCALE 7
(7)
Proficient reflection on Belbin roles that have been observed in the team
SCALE 8
(8)
Excellent reflection on Belbin roles that have been observed in the team
SCALE 9
(9)
Outstanding reflection on Belbin roles that have been observed in the team
SCALE 10
(10)
Faultless reflection on Belbin roles that have been observed in the team
CRITERION 6 (10%)
7 / 10
SCALE 1
(0)
no theories, models or frameworks used within the report.
SCALE 2
(2)
Poor use of theories, models or frameworks used within the report.
SCALE 3
(3)
use of one theories, models or framework within the report.
SCALE 4
(4)
Acceptable use and application of theories, models or frameworks within the
report.
SCALE 5
(5)
Appropriate use and application of theories, models or frameworks within the
report.
SCALE 6
(6)
Competent use and application of theories, models or frameworks within the
report.
SCALE 7
(7)
Proficient use and application of theories, models or frameworks within the report.
SCALE 8
(8)
Excellent use and application of theories, models or frameworks within the report.
SCALE 9
(9)
Outstanding use and application of theories, models or frameworks within the
report.
SCALE 10
(10)
Exceptional use and application of theories, models or frameworks within the
report.
CRITERION 7 (10%)
7 / 10
SCALE 1
(0)
No critical evaluation and no application or synthesis of information
SCALE 2
(2)
Poor critical evaluation , application or synthesis of information
SCALE 3
(3)
Sufficient critical evaluation, application and synthesis of information.
SCALE 4
(4)
Acceptable critical evaluation, application and synthesis of information.
SCALE 5
(5)
Reasonable critical evaluation, application and synthesis of information.
SCALE 6
(6)
Commendable critical evaluation, application and synthesis of information.
SCALE 7
(7)
Very good critical evaluation, application and synthesis of information.
SCALE 8
(8)
Excellent critical evaluation, application and synthesis of information.
SCALE 9
(9)
Impeccable critical evaluation, application and synthesis of information.
SCALE 10
(10)
Exxceptional critical evaluation, application and synthesis of information.
CRITERION 8 (10%)
8 / 10
SCALE 1
(0)
No evidence of research
SCALE 2
(2)
Poor, unclear, incomplete, no link between information searched and the report
SCALE 3
(3)
Limited, unclear, incomplete, no link between research done and report.
SCALE 4
(4)
Satisfactory evidence of research gathered. Research and analysis is
inconsistentent but there is some evidence it feeds into the report.
SCALE 5
(5)
Appropriate evidence of research gathered from a range of sources. Research and
analysis is inconsistentent but there is some evidence it feeds into the report.
SCALE 6
(6)
Good evidence of research gathered from a range of sources. Research and
analysis are consistentent and feed into the report.
SCALE 7
(7)
Strong evidence of research gathered from a wide range of sources. Research and
analysis are consistentent and feed into the report.
SCALE 8
(8)
Excellent evidence of research gathered from a wide range of sources. Research
and analysis are consistentent and feed into the report.
SCALE 9
(9)
Outstanding evidence of research gathered from a wide range of sources.
Research and analysis are consistentent and feed into the report.
SCALE 10
(10)
Exceptional evidence research gathered from a wide range of sources. Research
and analysis are consistentent and feed into the report.
CRITERION 9 (10%)
SCALE 1
(0)
8 / 10
The report is illigible and does not make sense
SCALE 2
(2)
The English, including style and spelling is unacceptable. Several spelling and
grammatical mistakes. The author does not make use of business English
language
SCALE 3
(3)
The English, including style and spelling is very limited and incomplete. Several
spelling and grammatical mistakes. The author does not make use of proper
business English language
SCALE 4
(4)
The English, including style and spelling is adequate. There are some distracting
spelling and grammatical mistakes. The author does not make use of business
English language. Basic grammar mistakes are highlighted by an overly informal
tone
SCALE 5
(5)
The English, including style and spelling is clear and understandable. There are
still some distracting spelling and grammatical mistakes. Limited use of business
English language.
SCALE 6
(6)
The English, including style and spelling is clear and understandable. There are
no spelling and grammatical mistakes. Confident use of business English
language.
SCALE 7
(7)
High quality and very good presentation with fluent and compelling writing style
and use of business English language. The document is professionally presented
SCALE 8
(8)
Excellent quality and presentation with fluent and compelling writing style and
use of business English language. The document is professionally presented
SCALE 9
(9)
Outstanding quality and creative presentation with fluent and compelling writing
style and use of business English language. The document is professional and
reflects the standards expected in academic or professional publications.
SCALE 10
(10)
Industry standards quality and creative presentation with fluent and compelling
writing style and use of business English language. The document is professional
and reflects the standards expected in academic or professional publications.
CRITERION 10 (10%)
8 / 10
SCALE 1
(0)
No citations and no references provided
SCALE 2
(2)
Poor referencing and citation and acknowledgement of sources.
SCALE 3
(3)
Limited referencing and citation and acknowledgement of sources.
SCALE 4
(4)
Satisfactory referencing and citation and acknowledgement of sources using some
of the the Coventry University Harvard reference style.
SCALE 5
(5)
Appropriate referencing and citation and acknowledgement of sources using the
Coventry University Harvard reference style.
SCALE 6
(6)
Good referencing and citation and acknowledgement of sources using the
Coventry University Harvard reference style.
SCALE 7
(7)
Strong referencing and citation and acknowledgement of sources, using the
Coventry University Harvard reference style.
SCALE 8
(8)
Excellent referencing and citation and acknowledgement of sources using the
Coventry University Harvard reference style.
SCALE 9
(9)
Outstanding referencing and citation and acknowledgement of sources using the
Coventry University Harvard reference style.
SCALE 10
(10)
Faultless referencing and citation acknowledgement of sources using the Coventry
University Harvard reference style.
Criteria
C1. Executive summary and
introduction
C2. Reflection on group activity while
working in a global diverse team
Weighting
10%
Learning
outcome
C4. Reflection on own leadership
experience throughout the
term/Team experience
C5. Reflection on Belbin roles that
have been observed in the team
C7. Critical evaluation and analysis
No attempt, No submission,
Absent
Poor, unsatisfactory, weak
No executive summary
Weak Executive Summary or
poor information provided.
No reflection on group poster
LO1, LO2,LO3 activity or poor information
provided.
Unsatisfactory reflection on
No reflection on conflicts and
conflicts and cultural
cultural differences among
differences among team
team members and how these members and how these have
10%
10%
LO2 & LO3
have been solved
LO1 & LO4
No reflection on own
leadership experience
throughout the term
been solved.
Unsatisfactory reflection on
own leadership experience
throughout the term
No reflection on Belbin roles
Unsatisfactory reflection on
that have been observed in the Belbin roles that have been
team
observed in the team
10%
LO1 & LO4
No theories, models or
Poor use of theories, models or
10%
frameworks used within the
LO1,
LO2,LO3,LO4 report.
frameworks used within the
report.
10%
No critical evaluation and no
LO1,
application or synthesis of
LO2,LO3,LO4 information
Poor critical evaluation ,
application or synthesis of
information
No evidence of research
C8. Research and information used in
the report
Unsatisfactory reflection on
group poster activity or poor
information provided.
10%
C6. Use of evidence and its
application in the report (theories,
models and frameworks)
2 (1-29)
LO1 , LO2 &
LO4
C3. Reflection on conflicts and
cultural differences among team
members and how these have been
solved
0 -Fail
10%
LO1,
LO2,LO3,LO4
Poor, unclear, incomplete, no
link between information
searched and the report
The English, including style and
spelling is unacceptable.
The report is illegible and does Several spelling and
not make sense
grammatical mistakes. The
author does not make use of
business English language.
C9. Writing style & use of language
C10. Citing & Referencing
10%
10%
LO1, LO2,LO4
LO1,
LO2,LO3,LO4
No citations and no references Poor referencing, citation, and
provided
acknowledgement of sources.
Course work 2 Rubric
3 (30-39)
4 (40-49) 3rd
5 (50-59)
Inadequate Executive
Summary with vague and
unclear information that does
not set the set the submission
in context.
Basic attempt at an Executive
Summary. May be more an
Introduction than a summary.
No inclusion of
recommendations. No in text
referencing.
Summary is provided. Some
aspects of the key features of Summary is presented which
highlights most of the key
the submission may be
features of the submission.
missing. Referencing is
undertaken but not complete Effective recommendations are
and the context of the report is provided but these are vague.
not clear.
Limited ability to reflect on
group poster activity or
incomplete and vague
information provided.
Demonstrates basic ability to
reflect on group poster activity
and basic information on
teamwork is provided.
Demonstrates a competent
Demonstrates a fair ability to
ability to reflect on group
reflect on group poster activity
poster activity and good
and appropriate information
information on teamwork is
on teamwork is provided.
provided.
Limited ability to reflect on
conflicts and cultural
differences among team
members and how these have
been solved
Demonstrates basic ability to
reflect conflicts and cultural
differences among team
members and how these have
been solved
Demonstrates basic ability to
reflect on own leadership
experience throughout the
term
Demonstrates a fair ability to Demonstrates a competent
reflect on conflicts and cultural ability to reflect on conflicts
differences among team
and cultural differences among
members and how these have team members and how these
been solved.
were dealt with.
Demonstrates a fair ability to Demonstrates a competent
reflect on own leadership
ability to reflect on own
experience throughout the
leadership experience
term.
throughout the term.
Demonstrates basic ability to
reflect on Belbin roles that
have been observed in the
team
Demonstrates a fair ability to
reflect on Belbin roles that
have been observed in the
team.
Inadequate, incomplete,
limited
Limited ability to reflect on
own leadership experience
throughout the term
Limited ability to reflect on
Belbin roles that have been
observed in the team
6 (60-69)
Competent, commendable,
Reasonable, fair, appropriate
Basic, satisfactory, acceptable
A competent Executive
reasonable Executive
Demonstrates a competent
ability to reflect on Belbin roles
that have been observed in the
team.
Appropriate use and
Acceptable use and application
Competent use and application
Use of one theories, models or
application of theories, models
of theories, models or
of theories, models or
framework within the report.
or frameworks within the
frameworks within the report.
frameworks within the report.
report.
Sufficient critical evaluation,
Acceptable critical evaluation, Reasonable critical evaluation, Commendable critical
application and synthesis of
application and synthesis of
application and synthesis of
evaluation, application and
information.
information.
information.
synthesis of information.
Appropriate evidence of
Satisfactory evidence of
Good evidence of research
research gathered from a
Limited, unclear, incomplete, research gathered. Research
gathered from a range of
range of sources. Research and
no link between research done and analysis is inconsistent but
sources. Research and analysis
analysis is inconsistent but
and report.
there is some evidence it feeds
are consistent and feed into
there is some evidence
into the report.
the report.
provided.
The English, including style and
The English, including style and spelling is adequate. There are The English, including style and
The English, including style and
some distracting spelling and spelling is clear and
spelling is very limited and
spelling is clear and
incomplete. Several spelling
grammatical mistakes. The
understandable. There are still
understandable. There are no
and grammatical mistakes.
author does not make use of some distracting spelling and
spelling and grammatical
The author does not make use business English language.
grammatical mistakes. Limited
mistakes. Confident use of
Basic grammar mistakes are
of proper business English
use of business English
business English language.
highlighted by an overly
language
language.
informal tone
Limited referencing, citation,
and acknowledgement of
sources.
Satisfactory referencing and
Appropriate referencing,
Good referencing, citation, and
citation and acknowledgement
citation, and acknowledgement acknowledgement of sources
of sources using some of the
of sources using the Coventry using the Coventry University
Coventry University APA
University APA reference style. APA reference style.
reference style.
7 (70-79)
Strong, proficient, very good
Overall very good and well
presneted
8 (80-89)
9(90-99)
10 (100)
Articulated, highly impressive,
Superb, outstanding, original
excellent
Faultless, publishable,
industry standard
Presented Executive Summary
that articulates the key
features of the submission
including recommendations
with rationale. Overall good
referencing.
Articulated and well-presented Outstanding Executive
Executive Summary that clearly Summary that clearly
indicates the key features of
articulates the key features of
the submission including future the submission including
recommendations.
recommendations.
Faultless Executive Summary
that clearly articulates the key
features of the submission
including, questios, findinds
and future recommendations
with rationale.
Proficient reflection on group
poster activity and very good
information on team work is
provided.
Excellent reflection on group
poster activity and excellent
information on team work is
provided.
Outstanding reflection on
group poster activity and
impeccable information on
team work is provided.
Faultless reflection on group
poster activity and exceptional
information on team work is
provided.
Proficient reflection on
conflicts and cultural
differences among team
members and how these have
been solved
Outstanding reflection on
Excellent reflection on conflicts
conflicts and cultural
and cultural differences among
differences among team
team members and how these
members and how these
were addressed.
resolved.
Faultless reflection on conflicts
and cultural differences among
team members and how these
were resolved.
Proficient reflection on own
leadership experience
throughout the term.
Excellent reflection on own
leadership experience
throughout the term.
Excellent reflection on Belbin
Proficient reflection on Belbin roles that have
roles that have been observed been observed in the
team.
in the team.
Outstanding reflection on own Faultless reflection on own
leadership experience
leadership experience
throughout the term.
throughout the term.
Outstanding reflection on
Belbin roles that have
been observed in the
team.
Faultless reflection on Belbin
roles that have been observed
in the team.
Outstanding use and
Proficient use and application Excellent use and application of
Exceptional use and application
application of theories, models
of theories, models or
theories, models or
of theories, models or
or frameworks within the
frameworks within the report. frameworks within the report.
frameworks within the report.
report.
Impeccable critical evaluation, Exceptional critical evaluation,
Very good critical evaluation, Excellent critical evaluation,
application and synthesis of
application and synthesis of
application and synthesis of
application and synthesis of
information.
information.
information.
information.
Strong evidence of research
gathered from a wide range of Excellent evidence of research Outstanding evidence of
Exceptional evidence research
sources. Research and analysis gathered from a wide range of research gathered from a wide gathered from a wide range of
are consistent and feed into
sources.
range of sources.
sources.
the report.
High quality and very good
presentation with fluent and
compelling writing style and
use of business English
language. The document is
professionally presented.
Excellent quality and
presentation with fluent and
compelling writing style and
use of business English
language. The document is
professionally presented.
Outstanding quality and
Industry standards quality and
creative presentation with
creative presentation with
fluent and compelling writing fluent and compelling writing
style and use of business
style and use of business
English language. The
English language. The
document is professional and document is professional and
reflects the standards expected reflects the standards expected
in academic or professional
in academic or professional
publications.
publications.
Excellent referencing and
citation and acknowledgement Outstanding referencing and Faultless referencing and
Strong referencing, citation,
of sources using the Coventry citation and acknowledgement citation acknowledgement of
and acknowledgement of
University
sources, using the Coventry
of sources using the Coventry sources using the Coventry
University APA reference style. APA reference style.
University APA reference style. University APA reference style.
Portfolio brief/guideline
100%)
Assignment Number and
Weighting
✓ Date: 8th August 2022
Submission Date and Time
✓ Time: 5pm
Yes
Anonymous marking
Expected return of feedback and 14 working days from submission
marked work
4000
Word Count
Assessment is made
multiple submissions
up
of No
Submission Procedure
Electronically via (Turnitin) ONLY
Assignment Title
Cross-Management Portfolio
Learning This assignment is designed to assess learning outcomes:
LO1. Evaluate different organisational and cultural
elements
that
affect
management
teamwork
and
individual
behaviour
practices,
in
the
workplace.
LO2. Illustrate examples of contrasting cultural
approaches in management and the general
Assessment
economic and business environment.
Outcomes
LO3. Apply concepts of management practices,
teamwork and individual behaviour to the analysis
of global business case studies in an intercultural
workplace
LO4. Reflect on own strengths and areas for
development as a member of a diverse team to
enhance a professional practice development plan
Part A: Company culture
Details of the task
1. Critically discuss in detail the following areas of your
chosen company; management approaches, leadership
style, organisational culture and employee motivation
of your chosen company.
You should use the theories discussed in class and
apply them using evidence of company practices from
the company research you have conducted.
The company must be the same as the one used in you
group task.
Part B: reflection on teamwork dynamics
1. Conflicts and cultural differences among your team
members. How did you overcome these?
2. Your leadership experience of your team throughout
the term, and its effectiveness.
3. Belbin roles you observed in your team members.
4. Your areas of strengths as a team worker and areas that
need development in the future.
You should answer part B by utilizing the dynamic of
how you worked with your group in constructing the
poster for the formative assignment or, from a similar
or equivalent previous experience(s).
Please support your arguments with the relevant theories
and literature.
Other information
Your research
1. Make sure you cite and reference all your sources of
research using the APA referencing style.
2. Use at least five different sources of information in your
research (credible websites, journals, books, and peer
reviewed academic papers).
3. You should be using sources from your textbook and the
e-library and/or other relevant information sources such
as the module resource list where you will find various
articles and books in your recommended reading list.
Please do not use any non-credible sources in your
research.
Assignment Structure
Portfolio Structure: Following the below the structure to organise your report.
✓ Anonymous coversheet (as attached in your assessment section)
✓ Title Page, including your module title, code and assessment name
✓ Contents Page (ensure this is done correctly and formatted professionally)
✓ Executive summary (give a brief summary of what your whole report is about)
✓ Introduction (introduce your topic, which is a reflection on your personal experience
working in global diverse team).
✓ Main body, which should also be organised under appropriate headings.
Part A: Company culture
1. Using theory covered from week 1-5; critically discuss in detail the following
areas of your chosen company.
•
Company management approaches,
•
Leadership style,
•
Organisational culture
•
Employee motivation.
Part B: reflection on teamwork dynamics
2. Conflicts and cultural differences among your team and how you overcame
these conflicts (you can use Toomey’s mindfulness theory, Hofstede, Hall,
Trompanaars, etc. to support your argument here, as appropriate).
3. Your leadership experience and its effectiveness ( you can use Leadership styles
and theories such as Autocratic, Democratic, Laissez-faire, Transformational,
Transactional, trait theory, behavioural theory, etc. to support your argument, as
appropriate).
4. Belbin roles you observed in your team and yourself (use Belbin model to
explain which role you observed in yourself and your team and why? and how
you complemented each other as a team?).
5. Your strengths and opportunities for development.
✓ Conclusion (Summarise what you have discussed in the entire report including; topics
of discussion and findings/results. Include remarks on what have you learned from this
experience).
✓ Reference list (list all your references here APA style, and ensure that you have cited
all these references in the body of your report).
Layout
Your work should be word processed in accordance with the following:
✓ Font style, Arial, font size 12.
✓ 1.5 line spacing.
✓
The page orientation should be ‘portrait’
✓
✓
Margins on both sides of the page should be no less than 2.5 cm
Pages should be numbered
✓
Your name should not appear on the script.
✓
Your student number should be included on every page.
Additional information – your research
✓ Make sure you cite and reference all your sources of research using the APA 7th Edition
referencing style
✓ Use at least 5 different sources of information in your research (websites, journals,
books, peer-reviewed academic papers)
✓ You should be using sources from Locate (the e-library) and/or other relevant
information sources such as the module resource list where you will find various articles
and books in your recommended reading list
Please do not use any non-credible sources in your research
Cover Sheet: Anonymous Marking
Degree Title:
Student ID:
Level:
Module Title:
Assignment Title:
Word Count:
Module Code:
Seminar Lecturer:
Link:
To shared files,
wordpress.com Blog, etc.
[Insert link here if relevant]
I, [type your student ID], confirm that this submission is my own work and I accept all responsibility for any
copyright infringement that may occur as a result of this submission.
Date of Submission:

Purchase answer to see full
attachment

  
error: Content is protected !!