+1(978)310-4246 credencewriters@gmail.com
  

Subject- Information Governance

Project Evaluation Rubric
Component
Project overview
Justification for
hypotheses
Supporting evidence
Review of relevant
research
Maintains
purpose/focus
Methodology
• Sample
• Procedures
• Measures
• Data analytic
plan
Grammar, clarity, and
organization
References and
citations
Exemplary (3)
Effectively and insightfully develops a set of
testable, supportable and impactful study
hypotheses.
The introduction section provides a cogent
overview of conceptual and theoretical issues
related to the study hypotheses.
Demonstrates outstanding critical thinking.
Adequate (2)
Develops a set of testable and
supportable hypotheses.
Inadequate (1)
Hypotheses are not testable or
justifiable.
The introduction section
provides a logical overview of
conceptual and theoretical
issues related to the study
hypotheses. Demonstrates
competent critical thinking.
Very little support for the conceptual
and theoretical relevant to the study
hypotheses was provided. Provides
little evidence of sound critical
thinking.
Provides clearly appropriate evidence to
support position
Sophisticated integration, synthesis, and
critique of literature from related fields.
Places work within larger context.
Provides adequate evidence
to support position
Provides a meaningful
summary of the literature.
Shows understanding of
relevant literature
The project has an
organizational structure and
the focus is clear throughout.
Identifies appropriate
methodologies and research
techniques but some details
are missing or vague.
Provides little or no evidence to
support position
Provides little or no relevant
scholarship.
The project is well organized and has a tight
and cohesive focus that is integrated
throughout the document
Identifies appropriate methodologies and
research techniques (e.g., justifies the
sample, procedures, and measures). Data
analytic plan is suitable to test study
hypotheses. Provides appropriate
justification for controls. Project is feasible
The manuscript is well written and ideas are
well developed and explained. Sentences and
paragraphs are grammatically correct. Uses
subheadings appropriately.
Properly and explicitly cited. Reference list
matches citations
The manuscript effectively
communicates ideas. The
writing is grammatically
correct, but some sections
lack clarity.
Properly cited. May have a
few instances in which proper
citations are missing.
Score
The document lacks focus or
contains major drifts in focus
The methodologies described are
either not suited or poorly suited to
test hypotheses. The methodology is
under-developed and/or is not
feasible.
The manuscript is poorly written and
confusing. Ideas are not
communicated effectively.
The manuscript lacks proper
citations or includes no citations.
Overall Total: ______________
1
2
Practical Connection Paper Rubric (500 Words)
Component
Proficient (15 to 20 points)
Competent (8 to 14 points)
Novice (1 to 7 points)
Assignment Requirements
Student completed all required portions of the
assignment
Completed portions of the assignment
Did not complete the required assignment.
Assignment strongly demonstrates graduate-level
proficiency in organization, grammar, and style.
Assignment demonstrates graduate-level
proficiency in organization, grammar, and style.
Executive Program Practical Connection Assignment
Assignment does not demonstrate graduatelevel proficiency in organization, grammar, and
style.
Assignment is well written, and ideas are well developed
Assignment is effectively communicated, but
and explained. Demonstrates strong writing skills.
some sections lacking clarity. Student paid some Assignment is poorly written and confusing. Ideas
Student paid close attention to spelling and
attention to spelling and punctuation, but there are not communicated effectively. Student paid
Writing Skills, Grammar, and
punctuation. Sentences and paragraphs are
are errors within the writing. Needs attention to
no attention to spelling and punctuation.
APA Formatting
grammatically correct.
proper writing skills.
Demonstrates poor writing skills.
Proper use of APA formatting. Properly and explicitly
cited outside resources. Reference list matches
citations.
Use of APA formatting and citations of outside
resources, but has a few instances in which
proper citations are missing.
The assignment lacks the use of APA formatting
and does not provide proper citations or
includes no citations.
Maintains purpose/focus
Submission is well organized and has a tight and
cohesive focus that is integrated throughout the
document
Submissions has an organizational structure and
the focus is clear throughout.
Submission lacks focus or contains major drifts in
focus
Understanding of Course
Content
Student demonstrates understand of course content
and knowledge.
Student demonstrates some understanding of
course content and knowledge.
Student does not demonstrate understanding of
course content and knowledge.
Work Environment
Application
Student strongly demonstrates the practical application,
or ability to apply, of course objectives within a work
environment.
Student demonstrates some practical
application, or ability to apply, of course
objectives within a work environment.
Student does not demonstrate the practical
application, or ability to apply, of course
objectives within a work environment.
Score

Purchase answer to see full
attachment

  
error: Content is protected !!